Skip to main content

Security report for compure.com

Compure Services Kft. · Technology · Hungary

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Compure Services Kft. is a small Hungarian technology company specializing in advanced audio mining and speech analytics technologies. Their core offerings include phonetic index search, speech analytics, and synchronization tools delivered primarily through SDKs for integration by software developers and solution providers. The company has a niche market position focusing on call centers, broadcasters, and other audio data users. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern front-end libraries and includes essential business and contact information. Technically, the site uses HTTPS but suffers from mixed content issues and lacks advanced security headers, which could be improved to enhance security posture. The presence of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA indicates moderate user tracking and bot protection. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, though a cookie consent banner is present. Overall, the domain is long-established and trustworthy, with consistent WHOIS data matching the business claims.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching compure.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Compure operates a B2B technology development business model, licensing its speech and audio analysis technologies via SDKs to partners and integrators. Their market positioning is specialized and technical, targeting software developers and solution providers in telecommunications and media sectors. The company emphasizes close partnerships and aligned product roadmaps. Revenue likely derives from licensing and partner agreements. The company’s long domain age and clear contact details support credibility. The partner ecosystem is limited but focused on software developers and call center markets. Growth indicators are not explicit but the stable web presence since 1999 suggests sustained operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and use of Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and mixed content loading over HTTP represent vulnerabilities that could be exploited. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited transparency in security operations. Data protection practices are minimal with no visible GDPR compliance beyond cookie consent. The security culture appears functional but could benefit from formal policies and improved technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Serve all website resources over HTTPS to eliminate mixed content vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish a clear privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance compliance and user trust.
  5. Establish and publicize an incident response contact or security policy to improve transparency and readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Compure Services Kft.
VAT number
HU22676281
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Compure Services Kft.
Description
Compure develops a special technology, that is able to extract the information from audio streams.
Key services
Audio mining, Phonetic index search, Speech analytics, SDKs for integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.6.16, Bootstrap CSS, Font Awesome, Slick Carousel, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Maps API
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional technology company focused on audio mining and speech analytics.
  2. Content is well structured with clear sections and product descriptions.
  3. Contact information is complete and includes physical address, email, phone, and contact form.
  4. No privacy policy page explicitly found but an Impressum page likely serves as legal notice.
  5. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  7. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Use of Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA indicates some user tracking and bot protection.
  9. Mixed content issues due to HTTP resources may pose security risks.
  10. No advanced security headers detected; DNSSEC not enabled.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.6.16 with Bootstrap, Font Awesome, and Slick Carousel for UI components. Google Fonts and Google Maps API are used for styling and location display. Google Analytics and Tag Manager provide analytics capabilities, while Google reCAPTCHA v3 protects forms from spam. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with some minified JS and CSS caching. However, mixed content issues due to HTTP resource loading and lack of modern security headers indicate technical debt and security risks. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed via domaindiscount24.net. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate but could be modernized and hardened for better security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with compure.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review compure.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.