Skip to main content

Security report for complianz.io

Complianz BV · Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Complianz BV operates a leading WordPress privacy compliance solution, trusted by over one million users globally. Their flagship product is a comprehensive Privacy Suite plugin that automates GDPR, ePrivacy, and CCPA compliance for WordPress websites. The company is positioned strongly in the WordPress ecosystem, leveraging partnerships such as with Really Simple SSL, and offers premium support and continuous feature development to maintain market leadership. Their target audience includes WordPress site owners and developers seeking robust privacy management tools. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates modern analytics, advertising, and performance optimization technologies. Hosting and security are managed via Cloudflare, with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, though some enhancements like full HSTS enablement and advanced SSL features could improve posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR alignment. The site demonstrates high content quality, professional design, and strong trust indicators including user reviews and guarantees. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence with good security hygiene and privacy awareness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of complianz.io. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching complianz.io

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Complianz BV's business model centers on SaaS plugin sales with premium upgrades and support services, targeting the WordPress market niche for privacy compliance. Their competitive advantage lies in deep integration with WordPress, automated legal updates, and a large user base. Revenue streams include premium subscriptions and affiliate programs. The company maintains an active roadmap driven by client feature requests, indicating strong customer engagement and growth potential. Partnerships with Really Simple SSL and use of affiliate marketing expand their ecosystem. The company is medium-sized, based in the Netherlands, and founded in 2019. Their operations emphasize compliance, ease of use, and customer support, positioning them well in the privacy technology sector.

Security posture

The website exhibits a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced, Cloudflare protection, and multiple security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy. However, HSTS is present but not fully enabled, and SSL certificate details lack clarity on algorithm specifics. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The site uses secure forms and tracks user consent appropriately. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly found, which could be an area for improvement. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced SSL configurations and published security policies to increase transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable full HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  2. Clarify and upgrade SSL certificate algorithm and key length details for better cryptographic assurance.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Expand Content Security Policy to cover scripts and styles comprehensively to reduce attack surface.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Complianz BV
Registration number
CoC 717814475
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress stack using Elementor for page building and Easy Digital Downloads for e-commerce functionality. It integrates Google Analytics via MonsterInsights, Google Tag Manager, and Google Ads for marketing and tracking. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security features. Performance optimizations include WP Rocket caching and lazy loading of images. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. Technical debt appears low with up-to-date plugins and scripts. Opportunities exist to enhance SSL configurations and security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a fast, secure, and user-friendly experience aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 84/100Low23 findingsView report
  2. 84/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with complianz.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review complianz.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.