Skip to main content

Security report for compart.lv

Meta · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Facebook, operated by Meta Platforms, Inc., is a leading global social networking platform that enables users to connect, share content, and communicate with others worldwide. The platform's business model is primarily advertising-based, leveraging extensive user data to provide targeted advertising services. Facebook holds a dominant market position in the social media industry, supported by a suite of related services including Instagram, Messenger, and Threads. The website analyzed is the login page, which requires user authentication to access personalized content and services. From a technical perspective, Facebook employs a modern and sophisticated technology stack including React, GraphQL, and advanced performance optimization techniques such as BigPipe. The site is optimized for both desktop and mobile platforms, ensuring excellent user experience and accessibility. Security is robust, with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and secure form handling. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies that align with GDPR requirements. The security posture of the website is mature, reflecting the enterprise-grade infrastructure of Meta Platforms. No vulnerabilities or security issues were detected in the analyzed content. The domain's WHOIS information is not publicly available due to privacy protections, which is typical for large corporations. Overall, the website demonstrates high professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance with industry standards. Strategic recommendations include maintaining rigorous security audits, enhancing transparency in incident response, and continuing to evolve privacy practices to meet emerging regulatory requirements. These measures will help sustain user trust and regulatory compliance in a dynamic threat landscape.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 8 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching compart.lv

This scan found 10 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
85
Email security
98
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Facebook operates as a cornerstone of Meta Platforms' social media ecosystem, targeting a broad global audience. Its competitive advantages include a massive user base, integrated services across multiple platforms, and advanced advertising technologies. Revenue streams are predominantly from advertising, supported by data analytics and user engagement metrics. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with developers and advertisers. Growth indicators include continuous innovation in AI, video content, and new social features. Strategic observations highlight the importance of privacy and security as key differentiators in maintaining market leadership.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high level of security maturity, with enforced HTTPS, strong security headers, and secure handling of user credentials. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is evident through detailed policies and consent mechanisms. Incident response capabilities are not directly visible but are presumed robust given the company's scale. The security culture is reflected in the use of modern frameworks and continuous monitoring. No critical vulnerabilities or compliance gaps were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Maintain continuous security audits and penetration testing to identify emerging threats.
  2. Enhance public transparency regarding incident response and data breach notifications.
  3. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries to mitigate supply chain risks.
  4. Strengthen user education on privacy settings and security best practices.
  5. Develop long-term strategies for compliance with evolving global data protection regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Meta
Description
Facebook is a social networking platform that allows users to connect, share, and communicate with friends, family, and communities worldwide.
Key services
Social networking, Messaging, Video sharing, Advertising platform
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5, Bootloader, BigPipe, GraphQL, Relay
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web, Mobile Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Content Security Policy
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Facebook Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Meta Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK, Google Ads Conversions Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a login page for Facebook, requiring user authentication to access content.
  2. Comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms policies are linked in the footer.
  3. No direct contact information or incident response contacts are provided on this page.
  4. The site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and performance optimization techniques.
  5. HTTPS is enforced with strong security headers.
  6. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content is fully accessible.
  8. WHOIS data is not publicly available due to privacy and registrar policies.
Technical notes

Notes

Facebook's technical infrastructure is built on a modern JavaScript stack with React and GraphQL, enabling dynamic and responsive user interfaces. Performance optimizations such as BigPipe improve load times and user experience. The platform is hosted on Meta's global infrastructure, ensuring scalability and reliability. Accessibility and SEO practices are well implemented, supporting broad user reach. Technical risks are minimal but require ongoing management of dependencies and infrastructure to prevent service disruptions. Opportunities exist to further enhance mobile optimization and integrate emerging web technologies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with compart.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review compart.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.