Skip to main content

Security report for commerce.com

Commerce · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Commerce is a technology company focused on powering e-commerce growth through flexible and connected tools such as BigCommerce, Feedonomics, and Makeswift. The website presents a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging contemporary web frameworks like Next.js and React, and hosting assets on Google Cloud Storage. The site is well-optimized for mobile and SEO, providing a good user experience for its target audience of businesses seeking e-commerce solutions. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled, but lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching commerce.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Commerce operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, providing integrated platforms and services to help businesses grow online. Its key offerings include BigCommerce, Feedonomics, and Makeswift, indicating a focus on e-commerce platform solutions, feed management, and website building tools. The company targets businesses looking for scalable and flexible e-commerce solutions. The market position appears solid within the e-commerce technology space, supported by partnerships with known platforms. The business model likely revolves around SaaS and platform integration services. No explicit information about company size, founding year, or parent/subsidiary relationships was found. The website branding is consistent and content quality is good, supporting a credible market presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the lack of detected security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others suggests room for improvement in defense-in-depth strategies. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps, especially regarding GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts to enhance transparency.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce trust concerns.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Commerce
Description
Commerce helps businesses grow on their terms with flexible, connected tools like BigCommerce, Feedonomics and Makeswift.
Key services
BigCommerce, Feedonomics, Makeswift
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Makeswift
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google site verification

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google site verification
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or domain not registered under queried name.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  5. Website uses modern web technologies and has good SEO and mobile optimization.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  8. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, indicating a contemporary and scalable front-end architecture. Assets are hosted on Google Cloud Storage, suggesting reliable hosting infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS was explicitly detected, and accessibility features appear basic. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and preloading of fonts and images. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations to reduce technical risks and improve overall robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with commerce.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review commerce.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.