Skip to main content

Security report for cominder.eu

CoMinder · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CoMinder is a specialized IT services company founded in 2011, focusing on Oracle Database and Middleware administration, with additional expertise in IBM DB2, ZABBIX monitoring, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux. The company targets government institutions and private enterprises primarily in Latvia, the Baltic region, and Russia. Their business model centers on providing expert consulting, maintenance, and support services to improve IT infrastructure reliability and performance. The website content is professional and informative, highlighting certifications and partnerships that reinforce their market position as a niche expert provider. Technically, the website employs basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without advanced frameworks or CMS detected. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced accessibility features. No analytics or advertising technologies are present, indicating a minimal tracking footprint. Security-wise, the site is accessible over HTTPS (assumed from domain), but lacks visible security headers and published security policies, which limits its security posture. No forms or data collection mechanisms were found, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. Overall, the security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the provided content. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response information suggests room for improvement in compliance and security best practices. The domain registration data aligns well with the company’s founding date and business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include implementing privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, improving mobile and accessibility features, and publishing vulnerability disclosure or security contact information to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cominder.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CoMinder operates in the technology sector as a small-sized company with a focused niche in Oracle and related database and middleware technologies. Their competitive advantage lies in certified expertise and partnerships with major vendors like Oracle and Red Hat. The business model is service-oriented, providing consulting, support, and software licensing. Target customers include government and private sectors in the Baltic and Russian regions. The company shows stable growth indicators with a clear founding year and consistent domain registration. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized technology vendors, enhancing credibility. Operationally, the company emphasizes proactive maintenance and cost-effective IT infrastructure management, positioning itself as a reliable expert partner in its market segment.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with no visible critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is not evident, with no security or abuse contact channels provided. Data protection practices appear minimal, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The security culture could be improved by adopting standard security best practices and transparency measures to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve web security posture.
  3. Establish and publicize incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure procedures.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
  5. Consider deploying security monitoring and regular audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CoMinder
Description
CoMinder provides high quality information systems development, maintenance and support services focusing on Oracle Database and Middleware technologies, with expertise in IBM DB2, ZABBIX monitoring, and Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Key services
Oracle Database administration, Oracle Middleware administration, Monitoring services, Support and maintenance, Software licenses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company email and phone number.
  4. Certifications and partner logos enhance trustworthiness.
  5. No social media links or forms detected.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. Technical implementation is basic but functional with room for improvement in mobile and accessibility.
  8. Security headers and policies are missing or not detectable from provided data.
  9. WHOIS data shows consistent domain registration with no privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic web technologies including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without use of advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. The technical infrastructure appears simple and functional but lacks modern enhancements such as responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no indications of optimization or CDN usage. Hosting details are limited to registrar information (PDR Ltd.), with no explicit hosting provider identified. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection. Technical risks include outdated or missing security headers and lack of published security policies, which could impact business operations if exploited. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive frameworks, improving SEO and accessibility, and integrating security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cominder.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cominder.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.