Skip to main content

Security report for comelitgroup.com

Comelit Group Deutschland · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Comelit Group Deutschland is a medium-sized technology company specializing in security and communication solutions such as door intercoms, access management, video surveillance, and burglary protection. The company targets installers, property developers, planners, and housing companies within Germany, positioning itself as a reputable regional player. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with a clear focus on their core services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Bootstrap, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and likely CDN services, and integrates modern tools like Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie management and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, implements standard security headers, and provides a cookie consent mechanism, indicating a mature security posture. However, it lacks explicit incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, with moderate user tracking balanced by privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching comelitgroup.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates primarily in the technology sector with a focus on security solutions for residential and multi-family buildings. Their business model combines B2B and B2C elements, serving installers, developers, and end-users. The presence of a dedicated partner site (ComelitPro) suggests a structured partnership ecosystem. The website content and navigation are designed to support various customer segments, including installers and planners, indicating a strategic approach to market segmentation. Certifications and a cybersecurity page highlight their commitment to quality and security standards, which can be competitive advantages. The company maintains active social media channels, enhancing brand visibility and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. The use of Cookiebot for granular cookie consent shows compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security.txt file or explicit incident response contact emails limits transparency in vulnerability management and incident handling. The site could improve by adding these elements and enhancing accessibility features. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with formalized disclosure and response processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated incident response contact page or security email (e.g., security@comelitgroup.de).
  2. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add a clear terms of service page to improve legal transparency.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet higher standards for users with disabilities.
  5. Consider providing direct company contact emails and phone numbers on the contact page for improved customer trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Comelit Group Deutschland
Description
Comelit Group Deutschland offers security and communication solutions including door intercoms, access management, video surveillance, and burglary protection tailored for residential buildings, multi-family houses, and single-family homes.
Key services
Door intercom systems, Access management, Video surveillance, Burglary protection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Bootstrap 5, jQuery, Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager, Trustpilot widget
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, showing GDPR compliance.
  3. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram.
  4. No explicit terms of service page found.
  5. Contact page available but no direct emails or phone numbers found in HTML.
  6. Security page and certifications page exist indicating attention to security and compliance.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No incident response contact emails found.
  9. Website is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely supported technology stack including WordPress 6.8.2 and Bootstrap 5, ensuring responsive design and good user experience across devices. Integration with Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager reflects a mature approach to privacy and analytics. Hosting via Cloudflare provides performance benefits and security enhancements. The site loads with moderate speed and includes SEO-friendly meta tags. Some technical debt may exist due to reliance on multiple third-party scripts, but no critical issues were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and add structured data for enhanced search engine understanding.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with comelitgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review comelitgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.