Skip to main content

Security report for coloringlabs.com

Coloring Labs · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Coloring Labs is a small technology company specializing in the development of family-friendly coloring apps for iPad users, targeting children and parents. Their market position is niche, focusing on creative and educational digital content for kids. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging about their app offerings. Technically, the site is built using modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. From a security perspective, the website benefits from HTTPS encryption but lacks important security headers and formal security policies such as privacy or cookie policies. The use of PostHog analytics indicates moderate user tracking without visible consent mechanisms, which may raise privacy compliance concerns. No forms or sensitive data collection points were detected, reducing immediate risk exposure. Overall, the website is safe and suitable for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content. The absence of detailed business registration data and security policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and expanding contact information to build greater trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coloringlabs.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Coloring Labs operates in the technology sector with a focus on app development for iPad coloring applications. Their business model revolves around creating and distributing digital coloring apps designed by parents and approved by kids, targeting families. The company appears to be small-sized with no publicly disclosed parent company or subsidiaries. The website content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a positive market presence in a niche segment. The lack of detailed business registration and certification information limits deeper business intelligence insights. No partnerships or related domains were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are present, which could hinder effective security incident management. The use of PostHog analytics without visible cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and no forms are present to collect user data, minimizing attack surface. Overall, security maturity is basic and would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve web security.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical addresses to enhance business credibility.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and ensure inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Coloring Labs
Description
We create beautiful coloring iPad apps for boys and girls, kids and parents of all ages. Designed by parents, approved by kids, and enjoyed by all!
Key services
iPad coloring apps
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
iPad, Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to a single email address in the header.
  4. No phone numbers, physical addresses, or social media links detected.
  5. Uses modern web technologies including Next.js and React.
  6. Uses PostHog analytics for user tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage or main content.
  9. Content is family-friendly and safe for general audiences.
  10. No explicit business registration or certification information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and fast performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses web fonts and optimized images. Analytics are implemented via PostHog, a privacy-focused analytics platform, though no cookie consent mechanism is present. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks asynchronously, indicating modular code splitting for performance. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and implement security headers to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coloringlabs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coloringlabs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.