Skip to main content

Security report for collegioingegneriarchitettimi1563.it

Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano · Education · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano is a historic and reputable cultural association founded in 1563, dedicated to promoting the professional culture of engineers and architects in Milan. The organization offers professional training courses, events, publications, and membership services targeting professionals in engineering and architecture. The website reflects a well-structured and professional digital presence with clear navigation and relevant content for its audience. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks some advanced security headers and anti-CSRF protections. Privacy and cookie policies are present, with a named Data Protection Officer contact, indicating GDPR awareness. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its niche well.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching collegioingegneriarchitettimi1563.it

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as a historic professional association in Milan, leveraging partnerships with recognized local institutions and professional bodies. Its business model is non-profit and education-focused, providing value through training and cultural events. The website supports user engagement via login and registration for members, and promotes its services effectively. The presence of multiple partner domains indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The site targets a specialized audience of engineers and architects, with growth potential in digital training offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and password-protected login forms. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and anti-CSRF tokens in forms presents potential vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policy. The site could improve by implementing stronger security controls and bot mitigation on authentication endpoints. GDPR compliance is partially addressed with privacy policies and a DPO contact, but cookie consent mechanisms could be enhanced.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add anti-CSRF tokens to all forms handling sensitive data, especially login and registration forms.
  3. Introduce CAPTCHA or other bot mitigation techniques on login forms to prevent brute force attacks.
  4. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to explicitly obtain user consent in compliance with GDPR.
  5. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano
Description
Il Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano è una libera e indipendente associazione culturale fondata nel 1563, che promuove la cultura degli ingegneri e architetti attraverso conferenze, dibattiti, convegni, pubblicazioni e formazione professionale.
Key services
Corsi di formazione professionale, Eventi e visite, Pubblicazioni e convegni, Iscrizione soci
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2, Alertify, Slick Carousel, Flexslider, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager asynchronously
  • Password fields use type=password
  • Client-side input validation for codice fiscale

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is in Italian and targeted at professionals in engineering and architecture
  3. Site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks for UI and UX
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is not explicit
  5. Login form requires codice fiscale and password with client-side validation
  6. Multiple partner organizations linked with credible domains
  7. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS is enforced
  8. No terms of service page found
  9. Data Protection Officer contact is clearly provided
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery-based plugins for UI components like date pickers, sliders, and select boxes. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags. The site is mobile optimized with responsive menus and layouts. Performance is moderate, with multiple CSS and JS files loaded, some from external sources. Accessibility features are basic, with room for improvement in ARIA roles and semantic HTML. SEO is basic with meta description and Open Graph tags but no structured JSON-LD data detected. The site does not appear to use a common CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with collegioingegneriarchitettimi1563.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review collegioingegneriarchitettimi1563.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.