Collective Memory is a technology platform focused on creating a decentralized memory layer where users can share authentic memories globally. The platform emphasizes community engagement by allowing users to discover, invest in, and promote memories. It positions itself as a niche player in the decentralized social media and memory sharing space, leveraging modern web technologies such as React, Next.js, and Firebase for its infrastructure. The website is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, the platform enforces HTTPS and uses cloud hosting but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit incident response information. Privacy policies and terms of service are present, though cookie consent mechanisms are missing, indicating partial privacy compliance. Overall, the platform appears legitimate and professionally maintained, with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention collectivememory.ai, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for collectivememory.ai right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The platform targets a general audience interested in sharing and exploring memories with a decentralized approach. Its business model likely revolves around community-driven content and staking/investment mechanisms on memories, possibly generating revenue through tokenization or platform fees. The presence of social media and community links suggests active engagement and growth efforts. The lack of detailed company registration or contact information limits full business transparency but is consistent with privacy protection practices common in tech startups. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its unique decentralized memory concept and community investment features, positioning it distinctively in the social media and blockchain space.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could enhance trust and readiness. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms pages present but no cookie consent mechanism. The platform should enhance its security transparency and implement additional protective measures to strengthen its security maturity.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Enhance contact information availability with verified company emails or phone numbers to improve business credibility.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Collective Memory
Description
Explore authentic memories from around the world. Discover latest, most valued, and trending memories shared by the community.
Key services
memory sharing, community engagement, investment/staking in memories
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
React, Next.js, Firebase, Cloudflare Stream
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Firebase
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Marketing tools
Typeform
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
WHOIS data is unavailable publicly, indicating privacy protection.
Site uses modern web technologies and cloud hosting.
Privacy and terms pages are present but cookie consent is missing.
Contact is available via a contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
Content is community-driven and focused on memory sharing with staking/investment features.
No adult or explicit content detected.
Social media presence includes X (Twitter) and Telegram links.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring React and Next.js frameworks, hosted on Firebase and Google Cloud infrastructure. It uses Cloudflare Stream for video content delivery, ensuring efficient media streaming. The site is mobile-optimized and performs well with fast loading times. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Accessibility is basic but present. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or headless architecture. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities to improve security and privacy features.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with collectivememory.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review collectivememory.ai.