Skip to main content

Security report for coinfund.io

CoinFund Management LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CoinFund Management LLC operates as a cryptonative investment firm specializing in blockchain and web3 technologies. Established in 2015, the firm positions itself as an active investor and builder in the new internet economy, focusing on seed, venture, and liquid investment stages. Their website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging WordPress CMS with integrations such as HubSpot analytics and Yoast SEO to optimize user experience and search visibility. The firm maintains clear communication channels including multiple contact emails, phone support, and social media engagement, reinforcing their market credibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-clickjacking measures, though improvements are recommended in DNSSEC deployment and security headers. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, CoinFund demonstrates a mature business and technical infrastructure suitable for its industry niche.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching coinfund.io

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CoinFund holds a strong market position as one of the earliest cryptonative investment firms, with a portfolio exceeding 100 companies and multiple investment vehicles. Their business model centers on venture capital investment combined with active company and network building, targeting blockchain startups and technology innovators. The firm’s digital footprint includes strategic partnerships and a dedicated careers subdomain, indicating growth and operational maturity. Revenue streams likely derive from investment returns and management fees. The website content and structure support investor relations and talent acquisition, highlighting a collaborative culture and thought leadership through insights and media presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and uses clientTransferProhibited status to protect domain transfers. Anti-clickjacking scripts are present, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which could be a gap for compliance and trust. The use of third-party scripts like HubSpot and jQuery requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CoinFund Management LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CoinFund Management LLC
Description
CoinFund is one of the world's most experienced cryptonative investment firms. They invest in blockchain and web3 technologies, focusing on seed, venture, and liquid stages.
Key services
Investment in blockchain and web3 companies, Portfolio management, Company and network building, Active investor engagement
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, HubSpot Analytics and Scripts, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Bootstrap Grid v4.4.1
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Anti-clickjacking script present

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Clear focus on cryptonative investment and blockchain technology.
  3. Contact information is comprehensive and clearly presented.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and Slick Carousel for UI components. Hosting appears to be on AWS infrastructure, indicated by DNS servers. Performance is moderate with preloading of key images and videos for optimization. SEO is well addressed via Yoast SEO plugin and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. The site is mobile optimized with responsive layouts and media queries. Technical debt appears low, but ongoing maintenance of plugins and scripts is essential to sustain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with coinfund.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review coinfund.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.