Skip to main content

Security report for cohere.com

Cohere · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cohere is a leading enterprise AI platform specializing in secure, private, and multilingual AI solutions. Their platform integrates advanced language models, retrieval systems, and AI workspaces tailored for modern enterprises. With a strong market position, Cohere serves a diverse range of industries including technology, finance, healthcare, manufacturing, and public sector, offering scalable, accurate, and secure AI services. The company emphasizes data privacy, compliance, and customization, providing deployment options from SaaS to on-premises solutions. Technically, Cohere employs a modern tech stack including React, Next.js, and Vercel hosting, complemented by robust analytics and marketing tools such as HubSpot, Marketo, and Google Tag Manager. The website demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, implements comprehensive security headers, and maintains strong privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms. While no critical vulnerabilities were detected, recommendations include establishing a public vulnerability disclosure policy and explicit incident response contacts. Overall, Cohere presents a highly professional, trustworthy, and technically advanced platform with strong business credibility and a commitment to responsible AI practices.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cohere.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cohere.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cohere operates as an essential technology entity focusing on AI solutions for enterprises. Their business model revolves around providing AI as a service with flexible deployment options, including private deployments and cloud integrations. They maintain strategic partnerships with major industry players such as Salesforce, Oracle, Microsoft Azure, and AWS, enhancing their market reach and credibility. The company targets enterprises requiring secure, scalable, and customizable AI solutions, including data scientists and developers. Their extensive research output and open-source contributions position them as innovators in multilingual and multimodal AI. Growth indicators include a broad customer base with notable clients and active engagement in AI governance and safety research.

Security posture

Cohere exhibits a strong security posture with mandatory HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no exposed sensitive information in the website content. The presence of ISO 27001 and SOC 2 certifications underscores their commitment to industry-standard security frameworks. Privacy compliance is robust, featuring detailed privacy and cookie policies with consent management. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy and explicit incident response contacts suggests areas for improvement. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing scripts is well-managed, minimizing potential security risks. Overall, the security maturity is high, supporting the platform's enterprise focus.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including dedicated security or abuse email addresses.
  3. Regularly review and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance transparency around data retention policies related to analytics and tracking.
  5. Continue investing in multilingual safety and compliance measures to address global user base.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cohere
Description
Cohere provides a secure AI platform for enterprises, offering multilingual models, advanced retrieval, and AI workspace solutions tailored for modern enterprises. They focus on private and secure AI deployments with options for SaaS, cloud, VPC, and on-premises deployments.
Key services
Multilingual language models, Advanced retrieval models, AI workspace for enterprises, Private deployments, Customization and fine-tuning, Integration with cloud providers
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Vercel Analytics, Vercel Speed Insights, Marketo Munchkin, Facebook Pixel, FullStory, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, CookieYes
Frameworks
React, Next.js
Platforms
Vercel
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers implemented
  • Cookie consent with management options
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML
  • Use of reputable third-party security and analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics, FullStory, HubSpot, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
ZoomInfo, Marketo, HubSpot, Facebook Ads, The Trade Desk
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, FullStory, The Trade Desk
Marketing tools
Marketo, HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF or security blocks.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms are present.
  3. Clear and detailed terms of service available.
  4. Contact information includes verified company emails and contact forms; no phone numbers found.
  5. Strong security posture with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks (React, Next.js, Vercel).
  7. Extensive partner and customer logos indicating strong industry relationships.
  8. Active research presence with numerous published papers and technical reports.
  9. Good advertising and analytics practices with transparency and user consent.
  10. High-quality design, content, and user experience with excellent mobile optimization.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern and scalable infrastructure using React and Next.js, hosted on Vercel, ensuring fast load times and excellent mobile responsiveness. The integration of advanced analytics tools like Vercel Analytics, FullStory, HubSpot, and Google Tag Manager supports comprehensive user behavior tracking and marketing optimization. The CMS is Sanity.io, providing flexible content management. The site employs best practices in SEO and accessibility, with well-structured metadata and ARIA roles. No technical debt or major risks were identified, indicating a mature and well-maintained technical environment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cohere.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cohere.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.