Skip to main content

Security report for codex.lv

Codex · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Codex is a technology company specializing in full potential software engineering (P3) and innovative IT solutions targeted at businesses in the Baltic region. Their offerings include information system development, maintenance, integrations, audits, and DevOps services. The company positions itself as a leading IT solutions provider in the Baltics with a strong focus on efficiency, growth, and digital transformation. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for performance and multilingual support, and it uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The company holds multiple ISO certifications, enhancing trust and credibility. Overall, Codex presents a strong business and technical profile with room for improvement in transparency around security policies and incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching codex.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Codex operates in the technology sector, focusing on software engineering and IT services for local and regional businesses in Latvia and the Baltics. Their unique P3 approach emphasizes comprehensive project scope, potential, and engineering processes. The company targets medium-sized enterprises seeking digital transformation and efficiency gains. Codex maintains a professional brand with ISO certifications and a clear mission and vision. Their business model revolves around service delivery in software development, system integration, and IT consulting. The website content and structure support a high level of professionalism and market positioning. Partnerships include web development agencies like Sem.lv. The company demonstrates growth orientation through recent news and certifications, but lacks publicly disclosed financial or ownership data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements, indicating a baseline of security and privacy compliance. No security headers were explicitly detected in the HTML content, suggesting potential for enhancement. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, which are important for transparency and trust. The presence of ISO 27001 certification mentioned in news articles suggests internal security management practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the site content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for security. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by publishing security policies and incident response contacts and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Add incident response contact information or abuse email to improve transparency.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Codex"
VAT number
LV50203160401
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Codex
Description
Codex P3 Pilna Potenciāla Programminženierija ir unikāla pieeja, kas palīdz uzņēmumiem Baltijā sasniegt pilnu efektivitāti un izaugsmi. Piedāvājam inovatīvus IT risinājumus, informācijas sistēmu izveidi, uzturēšanu, un DevOps risinājumus, lai veicinātu organizāciju panākumus un digitalizāciju.
Key services
Informācijas sistēmu izveide, Informācijas sistēmu uzturēšana un attīstība, Integrācijas, Auditi, E-pakalpojumu izstrādes platforma, DevOps risinājumi
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Leaflet.js
Frameworks
WPML (WordPress Multilingual Plugin), Autoptimize
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is complete and clearly presented.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. ISO certifications prominently mentioned, indicating quality and security focus.
  7. Uses WordPress CMS with modern optimization plugins and multilingual support.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  10. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on homepage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with modern optimization plugins such as Autoptimize and WPML for multilingual support. It uses JavaScript libraries including Leaflet.js for maps and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. Performance is optimized with lazy loading of images and deferred script loading. Mobile optimization and accessibility features like font size and contrast controls are implemented, enhancing user experience. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a fast and responsive website. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and provide more detailed technical documentation on security and privacy.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with codex.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review codex.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.