Skip to main content

Security report for codelight.eu

Codelight · Technology · Estonia

Partial score · DNS & email only

52/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Codelight is a small Estonian technology company specializing in custom WordPress websites, WooCommerce stores, and bespoke web applications. Their market position is that of a quality-focused service provider emphasizing client collaboration and tailored digital solutions. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure built on WordPress with modern integrations such as Google reCAPTCHA v3 and Gravity Forms for secure contact form handling. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and accessible, reflecting a high level of digital maturity. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam measures, but lacks published security policies and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with clear business information and contact channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching codelight.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
52

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Codelight operates in the technology sector, targeting businesses needing custom web and software development services. Their competitive advantage lies in their expertise with WordPress, WooCommerce, Laravel, and accessibility audits. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on bespoke solutions and client partnership. The presence of client logos and detailed project case studies indicates a stable client base and growth potential. Social media links and professional branding support their market presence. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated. Revenue streams likely come from software development contracts and maintenance services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam. A honeypot field is implemented in the contact form, enhancing security. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. Privacy compliance is lacking, with no privacy or cookie policies found. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by publishing security policies, implementing security headers, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Codelight OÜ
VAT number
EE101638850
Registration number
12259527
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Codelight
Description
Codelight specializes in crafting custom WordPress websites, WooCommerce stores, and bespoke web applications. They also work with Laravel framework and emphasize collaboration with clients to deliver tailor-made digital solutions.
Key services
Software Development, PHP World, WordPress, eCommerce, WCAG / Accessibility Audits, Maintenance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Gravity Forms, Google reCAPTCHA v3, WordPress
Frameworks
Laravel (mentioned in content)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form
  • Honeypot field in form to prevent spam

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including emails and a contact form.
  4. Uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection on forms.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. No phone numbers or physical address details beyond office location map image.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No analytics services explicitly detected.
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses jQuery and Gravity Forms plugins. Google reCAPTCHA v3 is integrated for spam protection. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy compliance to reduce risk and enhance trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with codelight.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review codelight.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.