Skip to main content

Security report for codeandtonic.com

Technology · Canada

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Conversiontracking.io is a small, specialized digital agency founded in 2024, focusing on improving conversion tracking and analytics for marketers using Google and Meta advertising platforms. The website is built on Squarespace and integrates modern tracking technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel to deliver measurable improvements in ad performance. While the technical infrastructure is solid and the site is professionally designed with good user experience, there is a notable absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and privacy posture. Security practices are generally good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, but DNSSEC and HSTS are not enabled, representing areas for improvement. Overall, the business appears legitimate and trustworthy, with a clear market niche and professional branding.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching codeandtonic.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a conversion tracking specialist targeting marketers and businesses that rely on paid advertising. Its competitive advantage lies in delivering measurable conversion improvements by leveraging AI-driven ad platforms through accurate tracking implementations. The business model is a one-person digital agency offering flexible and quick services, primarily focused on Google and Meta ad ecosystems. The website content emphasizes transparency and results, aiming to build trust with clients frustrated by ineffective tracking setups. The presence of a Twitter account supports marketing outreach. The domain is newly registered but consistent with a startup agency. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and has domain transfer and update protections enabled, which are positive security indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and HSTS headers are missing, which could expose users to DNS spoofing or downgrade attacks. No privacy or security policies are published, and no incident response contacts are provided, indicating limited formal security governance. The use of third-party scripts like Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager is standard but requires proper configuration to ensure privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected in the content or scripts. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with better DNS security and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) headers to enforce HTTPS usage.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner with opt-in/out mechanisms to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security or abuse contacts to enhance trust and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Helps clients with conversion tracking, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel and related services to improve ad conversion performance.
Key services
Conversion tracking setup, Google Tag Manager implementation, Google Analytics configuration, Facebook Pixel setup, Hubspot Conversion Tracking Service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, jQuery 3.6.0, PostHog (commented out), Stape.io GTM Power Up (commented out)
Frameworks
Squarespace platform
Platforms
Squarespace hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Domain transfer and update protection enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, PostHog (commented out)
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Meta (Facebook) Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, PostHog (commented out)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small digital agency specializing in conversion tracking and analytics.
  2. Content is professional and focused on marketing technology services.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Uses modern tracking and analytics technologies.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. Domain is new but consistent with business type.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace CMS platform, leveraging its hosting and content management capabilities. It uses modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery 3.6.0 and integrates Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for tracking and analytics. Cookiebot is included but no visible cookie consent banner is active. The site loads asynchronously and uses compressed scripts for performance. The design is responsive and optimized for mobile devices. SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags are properly configured. Performance is moderate, with some external dependencies on third-party CDNs and tracking services. Accessibility features are basic but present. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small agency website but could benefit from enhanced privacy and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with codeandtonic.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review codeandtonic.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.