Skip to main content

Security report for codeable.io

Codeable ApS · Technology · Denmark

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Codeable ApS operates a specialized freelance platform focused exclusively on WordPress development services, connecting vetted expert developers with businesses, agencies, and freelancers globally. The company emphasizes quality through a rigorous vetting process and offers a broad range of WordPress-related services including theme and plugin development, e-commerce solutions, and security enhancements. The website reflects a mature digital presence with excellent content quality, clear navigation, and strong branding consistency. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools integrated, ensuring good performance and user experience across devices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, security headers, and monitoring scripts, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly detailed. Overall, the domain registration and business information are consistent and trustworthy, supporting a high legitimacy score.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching codeable.io

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Codeable positions itself as a niche leader in the WordPress freelance market, leveraging a strict vetting process to differentiate from generic freelance platforms. Its business model centers on fixed-price project estimates and quality assurance guarantees, targeting business owners, agencies, and freelancers seeking reliable WordPress development. The presence of partner programs and affiliate marketing indicates a strategic growth approach. The company has established partnerships with reputable WordPress brands, enhancing its market credibility. The platform's growth is supported by a large pool of vetted developers and a strong focus on customer satisfaction as evidenced by testimonials and case studies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and the use of monitoring tools like Sentry. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicate compliance with GDPR and related regulations. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contact information, and a vulnerability disclosure policy represents areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The platform's vetting process for developers also suggests an internal culture of quality and security awareness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicly disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency around data retention policies related to analytics and user data.
  5. Continue monitoring and updating third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Codeable ApS
Description
Codeable is the only WordPress freelancer platform. We match customers to the best WordPress experts. We help customers solve any WordPress problem.
Key services
Theme Development & Customization, Plugin Development & Customization, E-commerce Development, Custom WordPress Development, Design, Custom APIs & Integration, Security & Performance, Troubleshooting & Maintenance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Segment Analytics, Sentry, Flickity Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress Theme, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security monitoring scripts (Sentry)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment Analytics, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Segment Analytics, Sentry
Marketing tools
Segment Analytics, Intercom
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Comprehensive and professional website with clear business focus on WordPress freelance services.
  2. Strong emphasis on vetted developers and quality assurance.
  3. Good SEO and accessibility practices.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. Active use of analytics and customer engagement tools.
  6. Clear cookie and privacy policies with consent mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses modern plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium for search optimization. It integrates analytics and error monitoring services like Segment and Sentry, enhancing operational insights and stability. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with optimized images and efficient use of CSS and JavaScript. The technical implementation reflects a well-maintained platform with opportunities to further improve security documentation and incident readiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with codeable.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review codeable.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.