Skip to main content

Security report for code.lv

fruits GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

fruits GmbH operates a premium domain marketplace platform, fruits.co, specializing in the sale and lease-to-own of high-value domain names. The platform emphasizes secure transactions through escrow services and buyer protection programs, targeting businesses and individuals seeking premium domains. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern technologies such as React and Next.js, ensuring a smooth user experience. Payment processing is securely handled via Stripe, supporting multiple popular payment methods. Despite the WHOIS data being privacy protected, the website demonstrates strong trust signals including clear contact options, buyer protection, and positive Trustpilot reviews. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are not published, representing an area for improvement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching code.lv

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

fruits GmbH positions itself as a trusted intermediary in the premium domain market, offering transparent pricing and flexible payment options like lease-to-own. The business model relies on seller fees while providing buyers with protection and escrow services, enhancing market confidence. Partnerships with seo.domains and MeUp.com expand its reach and credibility. The platform's target customers are domain buyers and sellers looking for secure, efficient transactions. The company operates in the technology and e-commerce sectors, with a small company size and a focus on the German market. The presence of detailed FAQs and buyer protection programs indicates a customer-centric approach and a mature operational model.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. Payment transactions are securely processed through Stripe, and escrow services mitigate transaction risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency. The platform would benefit from publishing these documents and providing dedicated security contact channels to enhance trust and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents or abuse reports.
  4. Consider publishing data protection officer contact details to strengthen GDPR compliance.
  5. Maintain and regularly audit third-party libraries and dependencies for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
fruits GmbH
Description
fruits.co is a premium domain marketplace offering domain purchase, lease-to-own, and negotiation services. It facilitates secure domain transactions with buyer protection and escrow services.
Key services
Premium domain sales, Lease-to-own domain purchase, Buyer protection program, Secure payment and escrow, Domain transfer assistance
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Stripe, Google Tag Manager, Sentry, PostHog
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure payment processing via Stripe
  • Escrow service for transactions
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
PostHog, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
PostHog, Sentry
Marketing tools
PostHog
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a premium domain marketplace offering domain sales and lease-to-own options.
  2. Strong buyer protection and escrow services are emphasized.
  3. Payment processing is via Stripe with multiple payment options.
  4. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no public registrant info.
  5. No security policy or incident response info published.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly listed.
  7. Contact via email and chat is available.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
  9. Modern tech stack with React and Next.js.
  10. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern React and Next.js stack, leveraging server-side rendering and optimized asset loading for fast performance. Integration with Stripe ensures secure and versatile payment processing. Analytics and error tracking are implemented via PostHog and Sentry, respectively, supporting operational monitoring. The site is fully responsive with excellent mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or headless architecture. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with code.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review code.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.