Skip to main content

Security report for cn-accelerator.site

NordVPN · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cn-accelerator.site presents itself as a VPN service provider closely associated with the NordVPN brand, offering fast and secure VPN services aimed at enhancing online privacy and unrestricted internet access. The site includes multiple references to NordVPN-related domains and scripts, indicating a strong brand alignment or affiliation. However, the domain registration is privacy protected and does not directly match the official NordVPN registrant information, which introduces some uncertainty about direct ownership or official status. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript assets and Cloudflare DNS services, ensuring HTTPS security and moderate performance. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, indicating some level of privacy compliance, though explicit privacy policies and terms of service pages are absent. The site lacks visible contact information and security incident response details, which are important for trust and compliance. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and domain transfer protection but lacks DNSSEC and security headers that could enhance its security posture. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected in the analyzed HTML. The absence of explicit privacy and security policies, combined with WHOIS privacy protection, reduces transparency and trustworthiness. Overall, the website appears functional and aligned with VPN service offerings but requires improvements in transparency, privacy compliance, and security best practices to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cn-accelerator.site. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cn-accelerator.site

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears positioned as a VPN service provider targeting general internet users seeking privacy and security online. The model is subscription-based VPN service, leveraging the NordVPN brand recognition. The extensive network of related domains suggests a broad ecosystem possibly including affiliates or service partners. The lack of direct registrant information and absence of contact details may indicate an affiliate or reseller operation rather than the primary NordVPN entity. The market positioning leverages NordVPN's reputation but lacks direct corporate transparency. Growth potential exists given the VPN market demand, but trust and compliance gaps could hinder customer confidence.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protection is active, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options limits defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are provided, which is a compliance gap. Cookie consent and GA4 tracking indicate some privacy awareness but without full policy disclosure. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The WHOIS privacy protection is standard in the VPN industry but reduces transparency. Overall, the site should enhance security headers, publish clear policies, and provide incident response information to improve its security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages prominently on the website.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to secure DNS resolution and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and abuse contacts.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NordVPN
Description
Fast, secure, and risk-free VPN for online privacy. Encrypt your traffic, change your IP, and browse freely without restrictions or intrusive ads.
Key services
VPN service, online privacy, IP masking, traffic encryption
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS, Nordcdn scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
cookie consent management scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with scripts from nordcdn.com.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  5. Website heavily references NordVPN brand and related domains.
  6. Domain WHOIS is privacy protected and registered via Namecheap.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response information available.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  10. No suspicious or malicious scripts detected in the provided HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern JavaScript assets hosted on nordcdn.com and is served over HTTPS with Cloudflare DNS. The domain is registered via Namecheap with privacy protection and uses Cloudflare name servers. The site includes cookie consent scripts and Google Analytics 4 tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks structured data like JSON-LD. Accessibility features are minimal. The site does not appear to use a common CMS. The technical stack is adequate but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved policy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 73/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cn-accelerator.site. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cn-accelerator.site.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.