Skip to main content

Security report for cmorganresume.com

Charles Morgan · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website cmorganresume.com serves as a personal portfolio and resume site for Charles Morgan, showcasing various professional works including web portfolio, flash commercials, training documents, and graphics. The site targets potential employers and clients interested in Charles Morgan's multimedia and web development skills. The business model is focused on personal branding and professional presentation, with a small-scale, individual operation. The website content and design are basic and somewhat dated, relying on deprecated Adobe Flash technology which limits accessibility and modern usability. From a technical perspective, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with embedded Flash content. Hosting is provided via HostPapa as indicated by the nameservers. The site lacks modern web development practices such as mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO best practices. Performance is moderate but could be improved by removing Flash and updating the technology stack. Security posture is weak, with no visible HTTPS enforcement, no security headers, and no DNSSEC enabled. The use of Flash introduces potential vulnerabilities and compatibility issues. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating poor compliance with modern privacy regulations such as GDPR. No contact information or incident response channels are provided, limiting trust and transparency. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile due to its personal nature and limited data collection, but it suffers from outdated technology and lack of security and privacy best practices. Strategic improvements should focus on modernizing the technology stack, enabling HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, and improving accessibility and trust indicators.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cmorganresume.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cmorganresume.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cmorganresume.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents an individual professional portfolio for Charles Morgan, positioning him as a multimedia and web development professional. The business model is personal branding aimed at attracting employment or freelance opportunities. The site does not indicate any partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies. Revenue streams are likely indirect, through employment or contract work rather than direct sales. The target audience includes employers, recruiters, and potential clients in the technology and multimedia sectors. The site shows limited growth indicators or marketing tools, suggesting a static presence. The lack of analytics and tracking tools indicates minimal data-driven marketing or user behavior analysis. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the site content or linked domains.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the website is low. Key vulnerabilities include the use of deprecated Adobe Flash technology, absence of HTTPS enforcement, lack of security headers, and no DNSSEC protection. There are no visible compliance measures for GDPR or other data protection regulations. The site does not provide incident response contacts or security policies, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Data protection practices are minimal, with no forms or data collection mechanisms detected. The security culture appears informal, consistent with a personal portfolio site rather than a corporate environment. Business impact of vulnerabilities is low due to limited data collection but could affect reputation and accessibility.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Replace deprecated Adobe Flash content with modern HTML5 or JavaScript-based media.
  3. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Add clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  5. Include contact information and incident response channels to improve transparency and security readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Charles Morgan
Description
Personal resume website showcasing Charles Morgan's portfolio including web, flash commercials, training documents, resume, graphics, and contact information.
Key services
Web portfolio, Flash commercials, Training documents, Resume, Graphics
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, JavaScript, Adobe Flash (SWF)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal resume and portfolio site for Charles Morgan.
  2. Content relies heavily on deprecated Adobe Flash technology.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in provided data.
  6. Domain is well aged and registered with a reputable registrar.
  7. Website design and content quality are basic and dated.
  8. No analytics or tracking technologies detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS with embedded Adobe Flash content, which is outdated and unsupported by most modern browsers. The hosting provider is HostPapa, as indicated by the nameservers. There is no evidence of a CMS or modern web frameworks. The site lacks mobile optimization and accessibility features, limiting usability on diverse devices and for users with disabilities. SEO optimization is minimal, with no meta description or Open Graph tags detected. Performance is moderate but could be improved by removing Flash and optimizing assets. The technical debt is high due to reliance on deprecated technologies and lack of modern web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cmorganresume.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cmorganresume.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.