Skip to main content

Security report for cmd.solutions

CMD Solutions · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CMD Solutions is an IT service provider specializing in hosting, mail, phone, fiber, backup, and milestone services. The company appears to target business clients seeking reliable IT and telecommunications solutions. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with multilingual support for French, English, and German. The technical infrastructure includes common plugins for SEO, analytics, and GDPR compliance, hosted via EuroDNS S.A. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service found. Contact is primarily via a web form, with no direct email or phone contacts visible. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but could enhance transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cmd.solutions

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CMD Solutions operates in the technology and telecommunications sectors, offering a suite of IT services tailored to business needs. Founded in 2014, the company maintains a consistent brand presence and targets a niche market with specialized offerings such as CMD Fiber and CMD Phone. The business model focuses on service provision rather than product sales, with revenue likely derived from subscriptions or service contracts. The multilingual website indicates an intent to serve a broader European audience. The absence of direct contact details suggests a controlled communication channel, possibly to manage leads effectively. The company uses standard digital marketing and analytics tools, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content or WHOIS data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protection enabled, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC reduces DNS security, and no security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of popular WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance, but the absence of a privacy policy is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with additional technical and policy measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Add explicit security and incident response policies accessible on the website.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CMD Solutions
Description
IT Service Provider
Key services
CMD Hosting, CMD Mail, CMD Phone, CMD Fiber, CMD Backup, CMD Milestone
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, MonsterInsights, WPForms, WebToffee GDPR Cookie Consent, Supreme Modules Pro for Divi
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, MonsterInsights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
MonsterInsights
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional IT service provider with multiple service offerings
  2. Content is primarily in French with multilingual support (English, German)
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or main navigation
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via WebToffee GDPR plugin
  5. Contact information is primarily via contact form; no explicit emails or phone numbers found in homepage content
  6. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and multiple plugins
  7. Google Analytics tracking is active with MonsterInsights plugin
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, leveraging multiple plugins for SEO, analytics, GDPR compliance, and enhanced UI components. The hosting provider is EuroDNS S.A., with domain registration dating back to 2014, indicating a stable online presence. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts and lazy loading of images. Mobile optimization is good, supported by responsive design elements. However, accessibility is basic and could be improved. The site uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for styling and icons. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, but security-related technical improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cmd.solutions. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cmd.solutions.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.