Skip to main content

Security report for cludo.com

Cludo ApS · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cludo ApS is a medium-sized technology company based in Denmark specializing in AI-powered site search solutions. Their platform enhances website search experiences by leveraging AI technologies such as AI Chat and AI Summary, targeting website owners and marketing teams globally. The company positions itself as a trusted partner with over 1000+ websites using their services, supported by strong customer testimonials and partner endorsements. Technically, Cludo utilizes a modern tech stack including HubSpot CMS, Cloudflare hosting, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4 and Microsoft Clarity. Security posture is solid with HSTS and content security policies in place, though the absence of modern TLS protocols and DNSSEC indicates room for improvement. Overall, Cludo demonstrates a mature digital presence with good privacy compliance and user experience, but could enhance security transparency and incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cludo.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
97
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cludo operates in the competitive AI-driven site search market, offering SaaS solutions that integrate easily with various CMS platforms. Their business model focuses on subscription-based services with a strong emphasis on customer support and strategic partnership. The company targets diverse sectors including technology, government, education, finance, healthcare, manufacturing, telecommunications, and tourism. Their market position is reinforced by positive reviews on platforms like G2 and FeaturedCustomers, and partnerships with notable companies such as Cisco and EasyJet. Growth indicators include continuous product updates, AI feature expansions, and a global customer base. The company leverages marketing automation and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and conversion rates.

Security posture

Cludo maintains a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced via a valid SSL certificate and HSTS enabled for one year. Content Security Policy is set to upgrade insecure requests, reducing mixed content risks. Cookies are set with HttpOnly, Secure, and SameSite=None attributes, enhancing session security. However, the lack of TLS 1.2 or higher support is a significant gap, potentially exposing users to weaker encryption. DNSSEC and CAA records are not implemented, which could improve domain and certificate security. No explicit security policy or incident response information is publicly available, and no security.txt file is found, limiting transparency for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by adopting modern TLS protocols, DNS security extensions, and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable TLS 1.2 or higher protocols to ensure strong encryption for all connections.
  2. Implement DNSSEC and CAA DNS records to enhance domain and certificate security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Develop and publicly share a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and tracking consent mechanisms to maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cludo ApS
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on HubSpot CMS and hosted behind Cloudflare, leveraging a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery and Splide.js for UI components. Performance is optimized with caching headers and CDN usage, resulting in fast load times. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and viewport settings. SEO is supported by canonical tags, Open Graph metadata, and structured content. The site integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Cookiebot for consent management. Technical risks include outdated TLS protocol support and lack of DNS security features. The infrastructure is robust but would benefit from modernization of security protocols and enhanced transparency in security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cludo.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cludo.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.