Skip to main content

Security report for cloudsecurityalliance.org

Cloud Security Alliance · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) is a globally recognized non-profit organization dedicated to advancing cloud security through research, education, certification, and community engagement. Established in 2009, CSA holds a leading market position by offering industry-recognized certifications such as CCSK, CCAK, and CCZT, alongside the STAR Registry for cloud security assurance. Their services cater to a broad audience including cloud security professionals, enterprises, government agencies, consultants, and academics. The organization emphasizes strategic initiatives in emerging areas like AI safety and zero trust, reflecting a forward-looking approach to cloud security challenges. Technically, the CSA website is built on a modern Ruby on Rails framework, leveraging contemporary web technologies such as Glide.js for carousels, Google Fonts, Font Awesome, and integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, ensuring a high-quality user experience. Hosting and DNS services are managed through Cloudflare, providing robust infrastructure support. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS with strong SSL configurations, employs security headers, CSRF protection, and uses reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with clear consent mechanisms. However, the site could enhance its security posture by enabling DNSSEC, publishing a formal security policy, and providing explicit incident response contacts. Overall, CSA presents a trustworthy, professional, and authoritative presence in the cloud security domain. The website's design, content quality, and technical implementation support its mission effectively, with minor recommendations to further strengthen security and transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cloudsecurityalliance.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudsecurityalliance.org

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CSA occupies a dominant position in the cloud security education and certification market, leveraging a non-profit model focused on community and industry collaboration. Their competitive advantage lies in recognized certifications, extensive research publications, and strategic initiatives addressing cutting-edge topics like AI safety and zero trust. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, training and certification sales, event sponsorships, and partnerships. The target customer segments span enterprises seeking cloud security assurance, professionals pursuing certifications, and government agencies requiring compliance training. CSA's partnership ecosystem includes regional chapters, training partners, and industry collaborators, enhancing its global reach and influence. The organization's operations reflect maturity, stability, and a commitment to evolving cloud security challenges.

Security posture

CSA's security maturity is high, evidenced by HTTPS enforcement, security headers, CSRF protections, and use of anti-spam measures like reCAPTCHA. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact is a gap that could affect transparency and responsiveness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The organization demonstrates a security-conscious culture but would benefit from formalizing vulnerability disclosure processes and publishing a security.txt file. Overall, CSA maintains a robust security posture appropriate for its role as a trusted cloud security authority.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  3. Provide explicit incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Implement and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosures.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloud Security Alliance
Description
The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) leads the industry in offering cloud security-specific research, education, certification, events and best practices.
Key services
Cloud security research, Certification programs (CCSK, CCAK, CCZT), STAR Registry and certification, Training and education, Events and webinars, Strategic initiatives in AI safety, zero trust, compliance automation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Glide.js carousel, Google Fonts, Font Awesome 6, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, reCAPTCHA v3, Zendesk widget (implied by JS variable), Cloudflare DNS and registrar
Frameworks
Ruby on Rails
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF protection on forms
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for spam prevention
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong focus on cloud security education, certification, and research.
  3. Active engagement with community via events, webinars, and working groups.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  6. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, built on Ruby on Rails with a custom CMS approach. Use of Glide.js and Font Awesome enhances UI/UX. Hosting via Cloudflare provides performance and security benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is fast with efficient asset loading. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting DNSSEC and enhancing security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100 −4Low23 findingsView report
  2. 84/100Low20 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudsecurityalliance.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudsecurityalliance.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.