Skip to main content

Security report for cloudhq.net

cloudHQ LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

cloudHQ LLC is a small technology company specializing in email productivity solutions, cloud backup, and migration services primarily targeting Google Workspace (G Suite) users. The company offers a broad portfolio of Chrome extensions and SaaS tools designed to enhance Gmail functionality, streamline email workflows, and provide secure cloud data backup and migration. With a user base exceeding 2 million and a focused product suite, cloudHQ holds a niche market position as a trusted provider of email and cloud productivity enhancements. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive product information, social media integration, and customer engagement features. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JSON-LD structured data, Google Analytics, and responsive design, ensuring good performance and SEO. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, though some security headers are absent and no explicit vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are provided. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR adherence, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is unavailable, which introduces some uncertainty about domain registration transparency, though the business information and online presence support legitimacy. Overall, cloudHQ presents a professional, trustworthy, and technically competent online platform with room for security and privacy enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudhq.net

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
70
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

cloudHQ operates in the technology sector with a focus on cloud productivity and email management tools. Its business model is SaaS-based, monetizing through subscriptions and freemium offerings of multiple Chrome extensions and cloud integration services. The company targets business users, professionals, and organizations using Google Workspace and other cloud platforms. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of integrated tools and seamless cloud synchronization capabilities. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including Google Workspace Marketplace, and leverages social media for brand presence. Growth indicators include a diverse product portfolio and a user base of over 2 million. Strategic observations highlight the importance of expanding security transparency and enhancing privacy mechanisms to maintain trust and compliance in a competitive market.

Security posture

cloudHQ demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site does not disclose a vulnerability disclosure program or incident response contacts, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. Privacy policies indicate GDPR compliance, but the lack of a cookie consent mechanism may expose the company to regulatory scrutiny. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for the business scale but would benefit from enhanced security controls, transparency, and user privacy protections to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure and incident response contact to improve security transparency and responsiveness.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with privacy regulations such as GDPR and ePrivacy Directive.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Monitor and clarify domain WHOIS information to improve registration transparency and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
cloudHQ LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
cloudHQ LLC
Description
cloudHQ offers email productivity workflow solutions and cloud migration and backup solutions
Key services
Email productivity tools, Cloud backup and sync, Cloud migration, Gmail extensions, Email templates, Email tracking
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, jQuery, Lity lightbox, JSON-LD structured data, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Platforms
Google Chrome Extensions, Google Workspace Marketplace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple product offerings
  2. Strong focus on Gmail and Google Workspace productivity tools
  3. Extensive use of Chrome extensions and integrations
  4. Good mobile responsiveness and SEO metadata
  5. No visible security headers detected in HTML source
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, raising some concerns about domain registration transparency
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web standards including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with jQuery and Lity lightbox libraries. It uses JSON-LD structured data for rich search engine results and integrates Google Analytics for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of explicit incident response mechanisms. Opportunities exist to modernize security practices and enhance privacy compliance to reduce technical debt and regulatory risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudhq.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudhq.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.