Skip to main content

Security report for cloudhosting.lv

CloudHosting SIA · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CloudHosting SIA is a Latvian-based technology company specializing in professional hosting solutions including virtual servers, dedicated servers, server colocation, and related IT services such as licensing and software development. The company targets businesses and organizations requiring reliable and scalable hosting infrastructure primarily in Europe. Their website demonstrates a solid digital presence with multilingual support and clear service offerings. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including jQuery and implements domain verification meta tags, indicating control over their domain. However, no CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, suggesting a custom or lightweight implementation. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers or published security policies. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, suitable for its business audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudhosting.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CloudHosting operates in the competitive European hosting market, focusing on small to medium business clients needing virtual and dedicated server solutions. Their business model is B2B, offering infrastructure and software licensing services. The company leverages trust signals such as domain verification and clear contact information to build credibility. The absence of WHOIS data limits external validation, but the website content and service breadth suggest a legitimate and established small enterprise. Their multilingual approach and comprehensive service catalog indicate an intent to capture diverse regional markets. No major partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and includes multiple domain verification meta tags, which are positive indicators. However, there is no evidence of advanced security headers (CSP, HSTS), published security policies, or incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found. The absence of WHOIS data restricts full trust assessment. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small hosting provider but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Conduct a WHOIS data refresh or use alternative WHOIS sources to ensure domain registration transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and perform regular security audits to maintain compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CloudHosting SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CloudHosting SIA
Description
CloudHosting SIA provides virtual servers (VDS/VPS), dedicated servers, server colocation, hosting, domain registration, SSL certificates, licensing, software development, IT audit, data protection, and other IT solutions primarily targeting businesses requiring professional hosting and IT infrastructure services.
Key services
Virtual servers, Dedicated servers, Server colocation, Hosting, Domain registration, SSL certificates, Licensing, Software development, IT audit, Data protection
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, jQuery 3.1.0, ISPmanager, cPanel, CloudLinux
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by og:url
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google site verification and other domain verification meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Ahrefs Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
ahrefs analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused, targeting hosting and IT service customers.
  3. Clear contact information and multiple language support present.
  4. No forms detected in the HTML content provided.
  5. Use of multiple domain verification meta tags indicates domain ownership control.
  6. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  8. Use of external analytics (Ahrefs) but no major tracking or advertising networks detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery 3.1.0. It uses ISPmanager and cPanel as control panels referenced in service descriptions, indicating familiarity with common hosting management tools. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and social profiles. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. No CMS or complex frameworks were identified, suggesting a custom or lightweight platform. The site uses external analytics from Ahrefs but no heavy tracking or advertising scripts. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and accessibility improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudhosting.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudhosting.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.