Skip to main content

Security report for cloudera.com

Cloudera · Technology · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloudera is a leading enterprise technology company specializing in hybrid data platforms that enable secure data management and cloud-native analytics. The company targets large enterprises across multiple sectors including technology, healthcare, finance, manufacturing, and government. Their platform supports data engineering, AI, streaming, and operational databases, positioning them strongly in the hybrid multi-cloud data market. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, strong branding, and extensive customer references. Technically, the site is built on Adobe Experience Manager with integrations of Adobe Analytics, Segment, Coveo search, and Brightcove video services. The site is mobile optimized and well structured for SEO and accessibility. However, the SSL configuration is currently invalid with no TLS protocols enabled, which is a critical security concern. Security headers are partially implemented but HSTS is not fully enabled. Privacy and compliance policies are comprehensive and prominently linked, indicating good GDPR and data protection awareness. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers and support portals. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, Cloudera's website demonstrates strong business credibility and digital maturity but requires urgent remediation of SSL and TLS configurations to improve security posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudera.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
55
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloudera operates as an essential technology enterprise with a focus on hybrid data platforms and AI solutions. Their business model revolves around providing scalable, secure data infrastructure and analytics tools to large enterprises globally. The company leverages partnerships (e.g., Octopai) to enhance metadata management capabilities. Their market position is strong, supported by a broad portfolio of products and services tailored for diverse industries such as financial services, telecommunications, manufacturing, healthcare, and government sectors. The website content and customer showcases reflect a well-established brand with a global footprint and enterprise-scale operations.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently limited by an invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which significantly reduce the security score. While some security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are present, HSTS is not fully enabled, and OCSP stapling is missing. Cookies are set with HttpOnly and Secure flags, which is positive. No known vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or POODLE were detected. The lack of valid HTTPS and modern TLS support is a critical issue that could expose users to interception or downgrade attacks. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not found on the site, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Immediately fix and renew the SSL certificate to ensure HTTPS is valid and trusted.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols to secure data in transit.
  3. Implement full HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS.
  4. Add OCSP stapling and enable session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Publish clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern enterprise CMS (Adobe Experience Manager) and integrates multiple advanced technologies including Adobe Analytics, Segment, Coveo search, and Brightcove video streaming. The site is mobile responsive, accessible, and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting appears to be via Fastly CDN, providing global content delivery. Performance metrics are not provided but inferred slow load times may be due to large page size and multiple external resources. Technical debt is minimal given the use of current technologies, but SSL/TLS misconfiguration poses a risk to business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudera.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudera.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.