Skip to main content

Security report for cloudchipr.com

Cloudchipr · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloudchipr is a technology company offering a cloud optimization platform that empowers teams with AI agents to optimize cloud costs, explain anomalies, send reports, and automate workflows. The platform targets FinOps professionals, engineers, and leadership teams, providing real-time observability and management across multiple cloud providers. The website is professionally designed using Webflow CMS and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and PostHog. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and reCAPTCHA used for forms, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and no visible consent mechanisms. Business credibility is supported by consistent WHOIS data and professional content, but contact information is not explicitly provided. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 13 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudchipr.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloudchipr positions itself as a SaaS provider in the cloud cost optimization market, leveraging AI to differentiate its offerings. The business model focuses on subscription-based access to a platform that integrates with major cloud providers like AWS, GCP, and Azure. The target audience includes FinOps teams, engineers, and leadership, indicating a B2B focus. The company was founded in 2021, consistent with domain registration data. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of tools including dashboards, resource explorers, automation workflows, and collaboration features. Marketing efforts utilize HubSpot and Google Tag Manager, suggesting a mature approach to lead generation and customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The company maintains a consistent brand presence and positions itself as an enterprise-grade solution, though the website lacks some trust signals such as certifications or detailed compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice to prevent DNS spoofing. No explicit security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure program, which are important for transparency and trust. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts increases the attack surface and requires careful management to avoid privacy issues. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a SaaS platform but could be enhanced by implementing additional security controls and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and vulnerability disclosure channels.
  6. Conduct regular security audits to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  7. Improve accessibility features to meet compliance standards.
  8. Enhance trust signals by displaying certifications and compliance badges.
  9. Limit third-party tracking scripts to essential services and disclose data collection practices.
  10. Maintain consistent updates to WHOIS and domain registration information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloudchipr
Description
Empower your team with AI agents to optimize cloud costs, answer questions, explain anomalies, send reports, assign tasks, and more.
Key services
Dashboards for real-time cost tracking, Resource Explorer for multi-cloud cost analysis, Live Usage and Management of cloud resources, Cost allocation via dynamic rules, No-code automation workflows, Collaboration integrations, Commitments tracking, Saving opportunities dashboard, Enterprise-grade security compliance
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Poppins), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot scripts, Facebook Pixel, PostHog analytics, reCAPTCHA, Finsweet FormSubmit, RB2B tracking
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Cloudflare (DNS and likely CDN)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Enterprise-grade security compliance claim

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, PostHog
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, PostHog
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a SaaS platform focused on cloud cost optimization with AI features
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or navigation
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts are used, including HubSpot and PostHog
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  6. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration
  7. DNSSEC is not enabled
  8. No WAF or security challenge detected
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is not privacy protected
  10. Website content is professional and well structured
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot, Facebook Pixel, and PostHog for analytics and marketing. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and professional design. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing third-party scripts. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected. The technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC implementation to reduce risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudchipr.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudchipr.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.