Skip to main content

Security report for cloudcenter.fi

Cloud Center Finland Oy · Technology · Finland

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloud Center Finland Oy is a Finnish IT service provider specializing in data center and cloud services, including system maintenance, backup, email marketing, and SMS solutions. Recently merged with Comspot to form Kyberjoukot Oy, the company aims to offer enhanced IT services to businesses and organizations of all sizes. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear service offerings and contact information. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.11.1 and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. While the site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, some technical improvements are recommended, such as updating libraries and enhancing security headers. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but lacks explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy compliance is adequate with visible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and serves its business purpose effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudcenter.fi

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cloudcenter.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for cloudcenter.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloud Center Finland operates in the Finnish technology sector, targeting business customers with a broad portfolio of IT services including hosting, cloud solutions, and communication tools. The recent merger with Comspot to form Kyberjoukot Oy indicates strategic growth and market consolidation. The company leverages well-known software products and maintains a professional online presence. Their business model focuses on providing flexible and scalable IT services to enterprises and smaller organizations alike. Partnerships with entities like G30 further strengthen their market position. The website content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement, though no direct e-commerce or subscription models are evident.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, the use of outdated JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.1 could introduce vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers and lack of published security or incident response policies reduce the overall security posture. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Privacy policies are in place and GDPR compliance is indicated, but cookie consent mechanisms could be enhanced. Incident response contact channels are not explicitly provided. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from improvements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Update JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website, including a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance cookie consent mechanisms to ensure full GDPR compliance and transparency in tracking practices.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor website security posture and update privacy policies as regulations evolve.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cloud Center Finland Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloud Center Finland Oy
Description
Cloud Center Finland provides high-quality data center and cloud services, specializing in maintenance and management of electronic business systems and server solutions. They offer services including email marketing, SMS services, and comprehensive IT solutions.
Key services
Data center services, Backup solutions, Maintenance services, Web services, Email marketing, Support services, Cloud services, SMS services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, jQuery UI 1.12.1, Google Analytics, Unslider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No vulnerable libraries explicitly detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Finnish and targets Finnish businesses.
  3. Clear merger announcement indicating recent corporate changes.
  4. No explicit terms of service found on the site.
  5. Use of older jQuery version may pose minor security risks.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and reasonably comprehensive.
  8. Contact information is clearly displayed with phone and email.
  9. No social media links detected in the provided HTML.
  10. Use of Google Analytics for tracking with basic privacy compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses legacy JavaScript libraries (jQuery 1.11.1 and jQuery UI 1.12.1) alongside Google Analytics and Unslider for UI components and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive CSS stylesheets for tablets and mobiles. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. No modern frontend frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. SEO optimization is basic with meta viewport and title tags but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Technical debt is indicated by outdated libraries and missing security headers, suggesting opportunities for modernization and improved security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudcenter.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudcenter.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.