Skip to main content

Security report for cloudbreach.io

CloudBreach Ltd · Technology · Iceland

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CloudBreach Ltd operates a specialized online platform providing cloud security trainings and certifications, focusing on practical, real-life scenario-based learning for cloud environments such as AWS and Azure. The company targets individuals and professionals seeking to enhance their cloud security skills. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with the Avada theme and integrates advanced LMS capabilities via Learndash, indicating a mature digital infrastructure for e-learning. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, supporting scalability and reliability. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protections, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a cookie consent mechanism via iubenda, but explicit privacy and terms policies are not found in the provided content. Overall, the website presents a credible and professional front for a small technology education business, with room for improvement in security and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudbreach.io

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cloudbreach.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cloudbreach.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CloudBreach positions itself as a niche provider in the cloud security training market, leveraging hands-on labs and certifications to differentiate from generic training providers. The business model is primarily online education with a focus on cloud breach scenarios, appealing to cybersecurity professionals and students. The company maintains active social media engagement across major platforms, enhancing brand visibility and community interaction. Revenue streams likely include course fees and subscriptions, with student discounts indicating market segmentation. The use of privacy protection in domain registration is typical for small tech firms. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified in the data. The company’s digital presence and content quality suggest a growth-oriented approach within the cybersecurity education sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags to prevent unauthorized transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and trust in case of security events. The cookie consent mechanism complies with GDPR requirements to some extent, but the lack of a detailed privacy policy is a compliance gap. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The security score reflects a moderate maturity level with recommendations to enhance DNS security and publish formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain a strong security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CloudBreach Ltd
Description
Empower yourself against cloud breaches with practical, real-life scenario-based cloud cyber security trainings & certifications.
Key services
Cloud security trainings, Cloud security certifications, Hands-on labs for AWS and Azure, Student discounts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada theme, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot Analytics, Hotjar, iubenda cookie solution, Learndash LMS plugin, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Learndash LMS
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Auto-renew enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot, Hotjar, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Hotjar, iubenda Cookie Solution
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on cloud security training
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via iubenda
  4. Multiple social media channels actively linked
  5. No direct phone numbers or physical addresses found in the truncated content
  6. Security headers not detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled
  7. Domain uses privacy protection service
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme and Learndash LMS plugin, indicating a robust e-learning infrastructure. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools including HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and iubenda for cookie management. Hosting on Azure suggests good scalability and reliability. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Some technical debt is noted in the lack of DNSSEC and security headers. The site uses standard libraries such as jQuery and Font Awesome. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but can benefit from security hardening and enhanced privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudbreach.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudbreach.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.