Skip to main content

Security report for cloudbees.com

CloudBees, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CloudBees, Inc. is a leading enterprise software company specializing in continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) solutions, primarily based on Jenkins. The company offers a comprehensive suite of DevOps tools and platforms designed to accelerate software delivery, improve developer productivity, and ensure security and compliance at scale. CloudBees holds a strong market position as the #1 Jenkins enterprise CI/CD platform provider, serving large enterprises globally with a focus on technology sectors. Their business model includes SaaS and on-premises offerings, targeting enterprise development teams and IT executives. Technically, CloudBees employs modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure with integrations to major cloud providers. The website demonstrates good digital maturity with responsive design, SEO optimization, and accessibility considerations. Marketing and analytics tools are implemented with user consent mechanisms, reflecting privacy compliance. From a security perspective, while the website implements multiple security headers and policies, a critical issue is the invalid or missing SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which significantly impact the security posture. The company maintains security policies, incident response contacts, and certifications such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001, indicating a mature security framework. However, immediate remediation of SSL and TLS configurations is necessary to protect user data and maintain trust. Overall, CloudBees presents a professional and trustworthy online presence with strong business credibility and technical infrastructure. Addressing the SSL and TLS issues will elevate their security posture and align with their enterprise-grade offerings.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloudbees.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CloudBees operates as an essential technology entity focused on DevOps and CI/CD solutions, leveraging Jenkins as a core technology. Their competitive advantage lies in enterprise-grade scalability, governance, and integration capabilities. Revenue streams include SaaS subscriptions, enterprise licenses, and professional services. The target customer segments are large enterprises with complex software delivery needs. Growth indicators include partnerships with AWS, Google Cloud, VMware, and high-profile customers like Salesforce and Autodesk. The company maintains a robust partnership ecosystem and emphasizes developer empowerment and security compliance. Strategic observations highlight CloudBees' shift towards unifying diverse DevOps tools without forcing migrations, positioning them as innovators in the DevOps space.

Security posture

CloudBees demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with comprehensive security headers and policies implemented on their website. They maintain recognized certifications (SOC 2, ISO 27001) and provide clear incident response channels. However, the invalid SSL certificate and disabled modern TLS protocols represent significant vulnerabilities that could expose users to interception and downgrade attacks. The absence of effective HSTS enforcement and OCSP stapling further weakens the SSL/TLS security. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, while organizational security practices appear strong, the website's SSL/TLS configuration requires urgent correction to align with best practices and enterprise expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Renew and properly configure the SSL certificate to enable valid HTTPS connections.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3 protocols and disable deprecated versions to enhance transport security.
  3. Activate HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload options to enforce HTTPS usage.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checking performance and security.
  5. Enable session resumption mechanisms such as session tickets or caches for better performance and security.
  6. Maintain and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program and security.txt file for transparency.
  7. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to avoid vulnerabilities.
  8. Enhance visibility of data protection officer contact information to improve privacy compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure with Contentful CMS for content management. It uses Google Tag Manager and OneTrust for analytics and cookie consent, respectively. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, likely due to extensive content and third-party integrations. Technical risks include the invalid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, which could impact user trust and search engine rankings. Opportunities exist to improve SSL/TLS configuration, enable advanced security features, and optimize performance further. The infrastructure supports scalability and integration with major cloud platforms, aligning with CloudBees' enterprise focus.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloudbees.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloudbees.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.