Skip to main content

Security report for cloud.microsoft

Microsoft · Technology · United States

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

92/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Microsoft 365 Copilot is a product offering from Microsoft Corporation, a leading global technology enterprise founded in 1975. The website serves as a sign-in and informational portal for Microsoft 365 Copilot, an AI-powered productivity assistant integrated with Microsoft 365 applications such as Word, Excel, and PowerPoint. The site targets both individual users and business customers, reflecting Microsoft's broad market reach and subscription-based SaaS business model. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, optimized for mobile and desktop platforms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching cloud.microsoft

This scan found 9 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
92

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cloud.microsoft, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,445
Employees
0
Customers
1,445
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
8%

16 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cloud.microsoft.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Microsoft holds a dominant position in the productivity software market, leveraging its extensive ecosystem of cloud services and AI technologies. The Microsoft 365 Copilot offering enhances user productivity through AI integration, appealing to a wide range of customers from individuals to enterprises. The business model is subscription-based, generating recurring revenue streams. Microsoft's partnership ecosystem includes various domains under its control, ensuring a cohesive user experience. The website content and structure reflect a mature digital presence aligned with Microsoft's corporate standards.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a strong security posture with HTTPS enforced, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Use of Microsoft Clarity and Azure monitoring scripts indicates active performance and security monitoring. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy, terms of service, and security incident contact information represents a compliance gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could enhance transparency and incident response readiness. Overall, the site aligns with best practices but could improve in compliance documentation and incident communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish and prominently link comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  2. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency.
  4. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools for security risks.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance disclosures to better align with GDPR and other regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Microsoft
Description
Microsoft 365 Copilot is your AI-first productivity assistant, helping you chat, search, create, and collaborate with your favorite Microsoft 365 apps including Microsoft Word, Excel and PowerPoint.
Key services
Microsoft 365 Copilot AI assistant, Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Teams
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Microsoft Clarity analytics, Azure monitoring scripts, Segoe UI font
Platforms
Microsoft 365 Cloud, Azure
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Content Security Policy present
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Azure Monitor
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, Azure Monitor
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a legitimate Microsoft 365 Copilot sign-in and information portal.
  2. Content is professional and consistent with Microsoft branding.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on this page.
  4. Privacy and terms pages are not directly linked or found in the provided content.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is present and active.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and analytics tools from Microsoft.
  7. No security or phishing warnings detected.
  8. No suspicious or malicious domains linked.
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Microsoft proprietary platforms hosted on Azure. It uses Microsoft Clarity for analytics and Azure Monitor for performance tracking. The site loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices with good accessibility features. The content is well structured with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO. No CMS was explicitly detected, indicating a custom Microsoft platform. The technical infrastructure is robust, supporting a high-quality user experience with minimal technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 92/100Low18 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloud.microsoft. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloud.microsoft.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.