Skip to main content

Security report for cloud.com

Cloud Software Group, Inc. · Technology · United States

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

87/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cloud Software Group, Inc. is an enterprise software provider specializing in mission-critical infrastructure solutions including virtualization, integration, data management, automation, business intelligence, collaboration, networking, and security. The company operates multiple well-known software brands such as Citrix, TIBCO, Jaspersoft, NetScaler, and XenServer, positioning itself as a leading technology provider for enterprise customers. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive information about its services and subsidiaries. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and TrustArc for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with good performance metrics. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no published security or incident response policies are found, indicating areas for improvement in security transparency. The security posture is generally strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be investigated further to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, Cloud Software Group presents a mature and professional digital presence suitable for enterprise clients, but should enhance security disclosures and resolve domain registration transparency to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of cloud.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cloud.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
87

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cloud.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
57,068
Employees
179
Customers
47,272
Third parties
9,617
Weak passwords
14%

Latest record dated 2026-06-15 · 1,013 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cloud.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –testdrive.cloud.com2026-06-15
  • –testdrive.cloud.com2026-06-11
  • –testdrive.cloud.com2026-06-06
  • –sso.cloud.com2026-06-06
  • –sso.cloud.com2026-06-06

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cloud Software Group holds a strong market position as a provider of enterprise infrastructure software solutions, leveraging a portfolio of established brands. Its business model focuses on delivering software products that address complex enterprise needs across virtualization, data analytics, and security. The company targets large enterprises and business customers globally, with a headquarters in the United States. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and partner domains indicates a broad ecosystem and diversified revenue streams. The website content and structured data confirm a recent founding date in 2022, suggesting a relatively new corporate entity possibly formed through consolidation or rebranding. The company demonstrates good digital maturity with integrated marketing and analytics tools, supporting growth and customer engagement strategies.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent management consistent with GDPR requirements, reflecting a solid baseline security posture. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and may hinder effective communication during security events. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which are recommended best practices for enterprise websites. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by adopting additional security headers and publishing comprehensive security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and provide a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS domain registration data to strengthen domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Cloud Software Group, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cloud Software Group, Inc.
Description
Cloud Software Group provides enterprise software solutions in virtualization, integration, data management, automation, business intelligence, collaboration, networking, and security.
Key services
Virtualization, Integration, Data management, Automation, Business intelligence, Collaboration, Networking, Security
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (G-HGF79C2XNY), TrustArc consent management, YouTube iframe API, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Adobe Dynamic Tag Manager
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Adobe Dynamic Tag Manager, TrustArc Consent Management
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging across pages
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information
  5. WHOIS data missing, raising questions about domain registration status
  6. Multiple trusted external domains linked, including subsidiaries and partners
  7. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, indicating a high level of technical infrastructure maturity. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and TrustArc for consent management, supporting data-driven decision-making and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident from meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with no significant loading delays observed. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that could impact security and trust. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and enhance domain registration transparency to reduce potential operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 88/100Low20 findingsView report
  2. 80/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cloud.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cloud.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.