Skip to main content

Security report for clixtell.com

Clixtell™ · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clixtell™ is a technology company specializing in digital marketing software solutions focused on eliminating PPC click fraud, tracking and recording marketing calls, and providing website visitor session recordings. The company positions itself as a world leader in call tracking and click fraud prevention, targeting digital marketers, advertising agencies, and businesses that rely on PPC campaigns. Their SaaS business model offers advanced analytics and fraud protection tools to optimize advertising ROI. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics integrations, including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Bing Ads tracking. The site is mobile optimized and uses caching and security tools such as WP Rocket and Google reCAPTCHA. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, impacting domain legitimacy trust. Overall, the website is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy from a business and technical perspective, but domain registration verification is recommended.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clixtell.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clixtell operates in the competitive digital marketing technology sector, offering specialized SaaS products that address critical pain points like click fraud and call tracking. Their market positioning as a world leader is supported by a comprehensive product suite and global reach. The company leverages partnerships such as Google Partners and maintains active social media presence to enhance credibility. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans for their software products. The target customers are agencies and businesses seeking to protect and optimize their online advertising investments. Growth indicators include multi-language support and continuous product enhancements. The ecosystem includes integrations with major ad platforms and analytics services, reinforcing their strategic market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to prevent automated abuse, and a cookie consent mechanism supporting privacy compliance. However, the lack of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Verify and publish domain WHOIS registration details to improve trust and legitimacy.
  3. Develop and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clixtell™
Description
Clixtell™ builds top rated software to eliminate PPC Click Fraud, track & record marketing calls, and watch your website as your users.
Key services
Call Tracking, Click Fraud Protection, Website Video Recorder
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.4, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads tracking, LiveChat, WP Rocket caching, Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes detected)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads tracking
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads tracking
Marketing tools
LiveChat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. Strong focus on call tracking, click fraud protection, and visitor session recording.
  3. Good SEO and metadata implementation.
  4. Multiple language versions available.
  5. Contact information and legal pages clearly linked.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trustworthiness score.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO for search optimization and WP Rocket for caching and performance enhancement. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Bing Ads tracking, and LiveChat for customer engagement. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with multimedia content such as videos and images well integrated. The technical infrastructure supports fast loading times and good SEO practices. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and some security headers are missing, which could pose risks. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with opportunities for security hardening and infrastructure transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clixtell.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clixtell.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.