Skip to main content

Security report for clickaine.com

Clickaine · Technology · Czech Republic

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clickaine is a well-established high-performance advertising network founded in 2016, operating primarily in the digital advertising technology sector. The company serves both advertisers and publishers, facilitating traffic buying and selling with a focus on delivering effective ad formats. Their market position is supported by a long domain age and consistent branding, targeting a professional audience in the advertising ecosystem. The website content is professional and well-structured, providing clear navigation and comprehensive legal and policy documentation. Technically, Clickaine employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, jQuery, and cookie consent frameworks, hosted on reliable AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical issues detected. The use of analytics and tracking is transparent and compliant with GDPR, supported by a cookie consent mechanism. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and domain registration includes protective statuses such as clientDeleteProhibited. A fraud alert banner warns users about impersonation risks, enhancing trust. However, DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not explicitly detected, indicating room for improvement. Incident response is facilitated via an abuse reporting page, though a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page is absent. Overall, Clickaine presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a solid business model and technical foundation. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing a security policy, and enhancing security headers to further strengthen their security posture and compliance stance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clickaine.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
40
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention clickaine.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,447
Employees
0
Customers
1,422
Third parties
25
Weak passwords
15%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for clickaine.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clickaine operates as an important entity in the technology sector, specifically within digital advertising. Their business model revolves around connecting advertisers and publishers through a proprietary ad network, generating revenue from traffic buying and selling. The company targets digital marketers, advertisers, and online publishers seeking high-performance ad solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their established market presence since 2016, consistent branding, and comprehensive support channels. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem including Telegram and Skype support channels, enhancing customer engagement. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with updated content and active blog and FAQ subdomains. The parent company, Danesco Trading Ltd., is registered in the Czech Republic, aligning with the website's physical address and business claims.

Security posture

Clickaine demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS enforcement and domain registration protections. The presence of a fraud alert banner indicates awareness of social engineering threats. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, and analytics usage is transparent. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents potential vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Incident response is supported via an abuse reporting page, but no dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure mechanism is published. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional DNS and HTTP security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and incident response procedures.
  4. Create and maintain a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Danesco Trading Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clickaine
Description
High-performance Ad Network providing services for advertisers and publishers, focusing on traffic buying and selling.
Key services
Traffic buying, Traffic selling, Ad formats, Support for advertisers and publishers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, svg4everybody, cookieconsent.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain statuses
  • Fraud alert banner warning users about impersonation
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Clickaine (self)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive legal and policy documentation is provided.
  3. Clear separation of support contacts for advertisers and publishers.
  4. Use of modern analytics and cookie consent mechanisms.
  5. No phone numbers explicitly provided in the content.
  6. No explicit security policy page found, but abuse reporting is available.
  7. Hosting via AWS DNS services indicates reliable infrastructure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and svg4everybody for SVG support. Cookie consent is managed via a third-party library ensuring GDPR compliance. Hosting is supported by Amazon AWS DNS services, indicating reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. The site includes comprehensive legal and policy pages, enhancing compliance and user trust. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by enabling DNSSEC and adding security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clickaine.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clickaine.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.