Skip to main content

Security report for clickagy.com

Clickagy · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clickagy is a data intelligence company specializing in anonymous audience identification and segmentation based on real-time digital behaviors, targeting marketers and advertising professionals. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear privacy policies and contact phone number, positioning itself as a niche player in the marketing technology sector. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers or advanced protections, and the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and cookie notice but lacks explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clickagy.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
70
Email security
73
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention clickagy.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
27
Employees
0
Customers
26
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
4%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for clickagy.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector providing data intelligence services to marketers, focusing on audience segmentation and behavior analysis. Its business model revolves around leveraging digital behavioral data to enable targeted marketing campaigns. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with a clear market positioning as a data intelligence provider. The lack of detailed company registration or physical address information limits full business credibility assessment. The presence of a privacy center and privacy policy indicates awareness of data protection regulations. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate with basic security practices observed such as HTTPS usage (assumed but not explicitly confirmed) and use of Google Tag Manager for analytics. However, the absence of security headers, vulnerability disclosure policies, and incident response contact information indicates gaps in security transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated but could be improved with explicit cookie consent and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Ensure HTTPS is enforced with strong SSL/TLS configuration and publicly confirm this on the site.
  3. Add explicit cookie consent mechanisms to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.
  5. Clarify domain registration details or ensure WHOIS information is properly registered and publicly available to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clickagy
Description
Clickagy is a data intelligence company that works with leading marketers to anonymously identify and segment audiences based on their real-time digital behaviors.
Key services
anonymous audience identification, audience segmentation, real-time digital behavior analysis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Material Design Icons, Roboto font
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered according to raw WHOIS output.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie notice are present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism.
  4. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. Contact information limited to a phone number; no email or physical address found.
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking.
  7. No forms or data collection fields detected on homepage.
  8. No social media links detected in provided HTML.
  9. Website content is professional and business-focused on data intelligence services.
  10. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and analytics, with Roboto font and Material Design icons for UI consistency. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the HTML. Performance is moderate with deferred CSS loading techniques. Accessibility is basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility features detected. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries, but security best practices could be improved with additional headers and policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100 −1Low26 findingsView report
  2. 77/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clickagy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clickagy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.