Skip to main content

Security report for clicetcetera.fr

Clic & Cetera · Technology · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clic & Cetera is a small local business based in France providing IT assistance and mediation services primarily in the Lorient region. The company targets both professionals and private individuals, offering on-site and business IT support. The website is built on WordPress and demonstrates a good level of technical maturity with modern CMS usage and responsive design. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks important security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy for its business scope but would benefit from improved compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clicetcetera.fr

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector focusing on IT support and mediation services. Its market position is local and specialized, serving the western Morbihan area in France. The business model is service-oriented, relying on direct client engagement for IT troubleshooting and mediation. The website content is relevant and professional, supporting the business's credibility. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with no parent or related companies disclosed. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting the site's readiness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence capabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Ensure domain registration information is complete and publicly available to improve trustworthiness.
  5. Consider integrating basic analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to enhance business insights.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clic & Cetera
Description
Assistance et médiation informatique dans le pays de Lorient, Plouay, Guémené sur Scorff pour les professionnels et les particuliers
Key services
Assistance informatique, Dépannage informatique, Médiation informatique
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, PHP, JSON-LD, CSS, JavaScript
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain may not be registered properly
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  4. Contact information is present and consistent with business domain
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern version
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Content is professional and relevant to IT assistance services
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.8.3, indicating up-to-date CMS usage. The tech stack includes standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain and a media subdomain, suggesting self-hosted resources. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. No third-party analytics or advertising scripts were detected, which simplifies privacy management but limits marketing capabilities. Hosting provider details are not disclosed in the data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business website but could be enhanced with improved security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clicetcetera.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clicetcetera.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.