Skip to main content

Security report for clearpoint.se

ClearPoint · Technology · Sweden

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ClearPoint is a Swedish IT management consultancy founded in 2013, specializing in providing senior consulting services in IT strategy, project management, design and architecture, procurement, workforce management, and strategic planning. The company positions itself as an independent and experienced partner with a focus on delivering practical and cost-effective IT solutions, primarily targeting businesses and organizations in telecom, mobility, aviation, and workforce management sectors. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear service offerings and client references. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, Bootstrap framework, and integrates external services like Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and AddThis for social sharing. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response information. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be improved by adding explicit privacy policies, security headers, and vulnerability disclosure information. The domain registration data is consistent with the business claims, supporting the legitimacy of the website. The site provides clear contact information and social media presence, enhancing trustworthiness. The risk assessment indicates a low risk with recommendations to enhance privacy compliance and security transparency to further strengthen user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clearpoint.se

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ClearPoint operates as a small-sized consultancy focused on IT management and strategic advisory services. Their competitive advantage lies in their senior expertise, broad industry experience, and independence as a link between business and suppliers. The business model revolves around consulting engagements, project leadership, and strategic planning services. Their client base includes notable organizations in telecom, aviation, and public sectors, indicating a strong niche market position. Growth is supported by a streamlined organization and digital workflows. The company leverages partnerships to extend capabilities while maintaining independence. The website content and client logos reinforce their market credibility and professional approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and compliance. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The absence of a dedicated privacy policy page is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a consultancy website but can be enhanced to meet higher standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and user rights.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish an incident response policy with clear contact channels for security issues.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Improve website accessibility features to enhance compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ClearPoint
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ClearPoint
Description
ClearPoint is an IT management consultancy providing senior expertise and services in IT strategy, project management, design & architecture, procurement, workforce management, and strategic planning.
Key services
Förstudier projekt, Design & arkitektur, Projektledning & Management, Upphandling, Strategisk planering & rådgivning, Workforce management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, AddThis sharing tools, Google Fonts, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URL is https)
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
AddThis
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Clear company branding and consistent messaging
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected
  8. Use of common WordPress plugins and technologies
  9. Social media presence on LinkedIn and Facebook
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and jQuery for scripting. SEO is enhanced via the Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. External integrations include Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and AddThis for social sharing. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The site is mobile-friendly and has a clear navigation structure. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The use of common and well-supported technologies suggests maintainability and ease of updates. However, adding security headers and improving accessibility would strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clearpoint.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clearpoint.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.