Skip to main content

Security report for clearout.io

Clearout · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clearout.io is a technology company specializing in email validation, email finding, and sales prospecting services. The platform targets businesses seeking to improve their email marketing and sales outreach by providing accurate and verified email data. The company operates primarily in the B2B SaaS market and has established itself as a focused provider in the email validation niche since its founding in 2018. The website presents a professional and modern interface built with Gatsby and React technologies, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Hosting and DNS services leverage Cloudflare and GoDaddy, ensuring reliable performance and security. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections, but lacks advanced security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of visible privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet GDPR and other regulations. Overall, Clearout.io demonstrates a solid business and technical foundation with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clearout.io

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention clearout.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
892
Employees
1
Customers
890
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for clearout.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –app.dev.clearout.io2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clearout.io operates in the technology sector, providing essential services for email validation and sales prospecting. Its business model is subscription-based SaaS targeting medium-sized businesses and enterprises that require clean and verified email lists. The company benefits from a clear market position as a specialized provider, leveraging partnerships with major platforms like LinkedIn and Facebook for social media integration. Revenue streams likely include tiered subscription plans and API access. The absence of explicit parent or subsidiary companies suggests an independent operation. Growth indicators include modern web technologies and active marketing via social media channels. Strategic observations highlight the need for enhanced privacy and security disclosures to build greater trust with enterprise clients.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain registration protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, particularly with GDPR. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate, reflecting a need for improvements in security best practices and transparency to meet enterprise security expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies including GDPR compliance details and implement a cookie consent mechanism.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve browser security.
  4. Develop and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility including dedicated security contact emails to improve trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clearout
Description
Clearout is a powerful platform that offers email validation, email finder and prospecting services to help businesses find potential customers.
Key services
Email validation, Email finder, Sales prospecting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, FontAwesome, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Gatsby
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found on main page
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  4. Professional design and clear business focus on email validation and prospecting
  5. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  6. Domain uses privacy protection but is consistent with business claims
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found
Technical notes

Notes

Clearout.io utilizes a modern web stack based on Gatsby and React, ensuring fast performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses FontAwesome for icons and integrates with Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare and GoDaddy, providing reliable infrastructure. The website is well-structured with appropriate meta tags for SEO. Accessibility is basic but functional. There is no detected CMS, indicating a custom or static site generation approach. Technical risks include missing DNSSEC and security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100Low19 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clearout.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clearout.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.