Skip to main content

Security report for cleanexit.org

EthixFirst · Education · India

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EthixFirst operates as a specialized platform focused on promoting and certifying professional ethics in the workplace, primarily targeting working professionals, employers, and employees in India. The business offers certification programs, ethics training, and career protection plans, positioning itself as a niche leader recognized by government bodies such as the Ministry of Education and AICTE. The website content is well-structured, professional, and consistent with the business mission. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain locks in place, though improvements like DNSSEC and CSP headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is good with a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. The domain registration is legitimate but very recent, which is inconsistent with the website's content history, suggesting a domain change or re-registration. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cleanexit.org

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EthixFirst's market positioning leverages government recognition and partnerships to establish credibility in the ethics certification sector. Its business model revolves around offering certification and training services, supported by channel partners and government endorsements. The target customers include professionals seeking ethics certification and employers aiming to foster ethical workplaces. The platform's growth is indicated by its active content, events, and channel partner network. The partnership ecosystem includes government bodies and regional channel partners, enhancing reach and trust. Revenue streams likely include certification fees, training programs, and subscription services. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding incident response and security policies to strengthen compliance and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status locks preventing unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and Content Security Policy headers indicates room for improvement. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, which could impact readiness for security incidents. Data protection practices appear standard, with no exposed sensitive data detected. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, balanced by a comprehensive privacy policy. Overall, the security culture is emerging but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to secure DNS queries and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and cookie policy to enhance privacy compliance and user trust.
  5. Develop and publish explicit security and incident response policies accessible on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EthixFirst
Description
EthixFirst is a comprehensive platform dedicated to promoting ethical standards in the workplace. It creates and certifies ethics standards for various departments and processes within organizations, helping foster a culture of integrity and transparency. The platform offers ethics training, certification, and career protection plans to reduce misconduct and fraud in organizations.
Key services
Professional Ethics Certification, Ethics Training, Career Protection Plan, Employee Rating Registration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Swiper.js, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status domain locks (clientDeleteProhibited etc.)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking
  2. Content is focused on professional ethics certification and training
  3. Website uses WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO
  4. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking
  5. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found
  6. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and comprehensive
  7. Contact information is available via contact form and email
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  9. Domain WHOIS data shows recent registration inconsistent with website content age
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The site uses standard web fonts from Google Fonts and iconography from Font Awesome. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy.com, LLC. The domain is newly registered, which may indicate recent migration or rebranding. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing advanced security headers. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but can be enhanced for security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cleanexit.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cleanexit.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.