Skip to main content

Security report for clastix.io

CLASTIX SRL · Technology · Italy

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clastix SRL is a technology company based in Italy specializing in Kubernetes multi-tenancy solutions designed to enable enterprises and cloud builders to operate Kubernetes at scale efficiently and securely. Their platform focuses on avoiding cluster sprawl and delivering hyperscaler-like Kubernetes operations with policy-driven automation and enterprise-grade support. The website demonstrates a strong market position with notable industry clients and a professional, modern digital presence built on Vue.js and Gridsome. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of privacy and cookie policies represents a compliance gap. Overall, the company presents a credible and trustworthy profile with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security header implementation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clastix.io

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention clastix.io, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for clastix.io right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clastix targets technology enterprises and cloud builders seeking scalable Kubernetes multi-tenancy solutions. Their business model combines open source foundations with enterprise support, positioning them as a modern alternative to legacy Kubernetes management approaches. The presence of high-profile clients like Nvidia and the US Department of Defense indicates strong market acceptance and trust. The company operates primarily in the technology sector with a focus on cloud-native infrastructure and Kubernetes management. Their partnership ecosystem includes open source communities and cloud infrastructure providers. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website, active GitHub presence, and a clear value proposition around operational efficiency and security.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses modern web technologies with no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries detected. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security or incident response policy limits the security maturity level. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response readiness is not publicly documented. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in security headers, transparency, and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Add incident response contact information and security-related communication channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and tracking tools to minimize potential vulnerabilities and privacy risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
CLASTIX SRL
VAT number
IT11183320966
Registration number
MI-2584914
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CLASTIX SRL
Description
Clastix provides a Kubernetes multi-tenancy platform designed to avoid cluster sprawl and enable hyperscaler-like Kubernetes operations. It offers scalable, secure, and policy-driven automation for managing Kubernetes infrastructure at scale, targeting cloud builders and enterprises.
Key services
Kubernetes multi-tenancy platform, Managed Kubernetes services, Policy-driven automation, GPU management, Edge computing, Bare metal Kubernetes solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Gridsome, Font Awesome 6, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Vue.js, Gridsome
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and scripts loaded over HTTPS)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • No forms detected on homepage to collect user input

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
good
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No visible contact phone numbers or contact forms on homepage; only email and physical address in footer.
  4. Strong branding and trust signals with notable client logos.
  5. Modern tech stack with Vue.js and Gridsome static site generation.
  6. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and transparent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Vue.js and Gridsome, a modern static site generator, ensuring fast loading times and good SEO optimization. The use of Google Fonts and Font Awesome enhances visual appeal and branding consistency. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing, indicating moderate user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Hosting appears to be via Google Cloud DNS and Google Domains, providing reliable infrastructure. No CMS vulnerabilities or outdated technologies were detected. The technical implementation supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for enterprise clients.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clastix.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clastix.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.