Skip to main content

Security report for clarity.cx

CLARITY · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CLARITY is a technology company specializing in quote-to-cash solutions with a focus on SAP CPQ and SAP S/4HANA services. The company targets enterprise clients seeking digital transformation in sales and revenue processes. The website demonstrates a professional digital presence built on WordPress with modern front-end technologies and integrated marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and cookie consent implemented, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and branding suggest a legitimate business. Overall, the site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides relevant business information but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clarity.cx

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CLARITY positions itself as a leading provider in the quote-to-cash market, leveraging SAP technologies to deliver tailored solutions. The business model is B2B, focusing on software and consulting services for enterprise clients. The website content and case studies imply a medium-sized company with a focus on technology sector clients. Marketing efforts include multiple tracking and retargeting services, indicating an active digital marketing strategy. The lack of explicit contact details and privacy documentation suggests areas for improvement in customer engagement and compliance. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating baseline security and privacy awareness. However, no security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no evidence of a published security policy or incident response contacts. The use of multiple third-party scripts introduces potential risk vectors that require ongoing management. The absence of WHOIS data and privacy policy reduces overall trust and compliance posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analysis. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement security headers, publish privacy and security policies, and enhance incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear and accessible contact information including company emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to foster trust and responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
CLARITY
Description
CLARITY is a provider of quote-to-cash solutions, specializing in SAP CPQ and SAP S/4HANA implementations and services.
Key services
Quote-to-Cash Solutions, SAP CPQ Implementation, SAP S/4HANA Services, Digital Transformation Consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, HubSpot Analytics, Splide Slider, Font Awesome, Urbanist and Bebas Neue fonts
Frameworks
WordPress (implied by wp-content URLs)
Platforms
SAP (business focus, not tech stack), HubSpot (analytics and forms)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by script sources (https URLs)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. Website uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or registry limitations.
  7. Content is business-focused, targeting SAP and quote-to-cash solutions.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Bricks Builder framework, utilizing modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience. Analytics and marketing integrations include HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookiebot for consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in accessibility and security header implementation. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business website but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clarity.cx. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clarity.cx.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.