Skip to main content

Security report for clarip.com

Clarip Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clarip Inc. operates a sophisticated SaaS platform specializing in enterprise privacy governance and data protection solutions. The company targets large enterprises, including Fortune 500 clients, offering a comprehensive suite of services such as consent management, data risk intelligence, vendor risk monitoring, and DSAR fulfillment automation. Their market position is strong within the privacy compliance technology sector, emphasizing automation and AI-driven data discovery. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with excellent content quality and user experience. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery, with integration of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features could be enhanced. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and technical modernization. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form submissions but lacks visible security headers and published incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, Clarip presents a credible and professional digital presence with strong business credibility and privacy compliance focus. Strategic improvements in security transparency and domain registration clarity would enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of clarip.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 20 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching clarip.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention clarip.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for clarip.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clarip's business intelligence reveals a focused approach on privacy governance automation targeting regulated industries and large enterprises. Their competitive advantage lies in patented hybrid AI technology and a broad product portfolio addressing data mapping, consent management, and vendor risk. Revenue streams likely include SaaS subscriptions and professional services. The company supports multiple industry verticals and regulatory frameworks, indicating a diversified customer base. Partnerships and integrations with major platforms enhance their ecosystem. Growth indicators include active content marketing, webinars, and comprehensive resource offerings. The lack of WHOIS transparency suggests a need for improved corporate disclosure to strengthen market confidence.

Security posture

The security posture of Clarip's website is solid with mandatory HTTPS and secure data collection forms. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate tracking but appears compliant with privacy standards. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature security baseline but would benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies to align with best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility compliance to broaden usability and meet regulatory standards.
  5. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure registration transparency and reduce suspicion.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Clarip Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clarip Inc.
Description
Clarip is the next generation SaaS data privacy platform that helps business and brands minimize privacy risks and engage customers better.
Key services
Privacy Governance Platform, Data Risk Intelligence, Consent Management, Vendor Risk Management, DSAR Portal, Automated Data Mapping, Privacy Impact Assessments
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, SVG graphics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
SaaS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with POST method
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on enterprise privacy governance and compliance
  3. Multiple product offerings and detailed resources available
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual for an active commercial site
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  7. Contact information and physical addresses clearly provided
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern front-end stack using Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and interactive elements. Integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager supports marketing and user behavior analysis. The site structure is well-organized with clear navigation and rich content. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times and optimization of third-party scripts. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site approach. Hosting details are not explicit, but HTTPS is properly configured. Technical debt appears low, though security header implementation and accessibility enhancements are recommended to future-proof the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 +22Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 49/100High31 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with clarip.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review clarip.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.