Skip to main content

Security report for cl.ly

Zight · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zight is a technology company offering an all-in-one screen recording software solution for Mac, Windows, Chrome, and iOS platforms. The company targets business users who require tools to create, edit, and share videos, screenshots, and GIFs efficiently. Positioned as an established player in the screen recording market, Zight provides SaaS-based services with a focus on usability and business productivity. The website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and marketing tools integrated, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration locks in place, but lacks advanced DNS security and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and absence of consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cl.ly

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
65
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Zight operates in the technology sector, specifically in software for screen recording and video content creation. The business model is SaaS, targeting business professionals and teams needing visual communication tools. The domain age of over 18 years supports a mature market presence. The company leverages multiple marketing and analytics platforms to drive user engagement and growth. Social media presence on major platforms indicates active brand promotion. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security disclosures may impact user trust and compliance with regulations like GDPR. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, suggesting an independent operation. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its multi-platform support and integrated editing features.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and domain status locks that prevent unauthorized domain transfers or deletions, indicating good baseline security. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers were detected in the provided content, which is a missed opportunity to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. The site uses several third-party analytics and marketing scripts, increasing the attack surface and raising privacy concerns without visible consent mechanisms. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in DNS security, header implementation, and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Add security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to enhance security transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zight
Description
Zight is an all-in-one screen recorder that helps you to create, edit and share videos, screenshots, GIFs for business.
Key services
screen recording, video editing, screenshot capture, GIF creation, video sharing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Clearbit
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Clearbit Reveal
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Clearbit
Marketing tools
Clearbit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based SaaS product site for screen recording.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in provided content.
  3. Multiple marketing and analytics scripts are used, but no explicit consent mechanism detected.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Social media links to Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and LinkedIn are present in structured data.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No incident response or security policy information found.
  8. SSL is enabled and domain status locks are in place, but DNSSEC is not enabled.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO Premium plugin for SEO optimization. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI components and icons. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Amazon Registrar, Inc., likely leveraging AWS infrastructure. Marketing and analytics tools include Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Clearbit Reveal, indicating a data-driven approach to user engagement. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site has well-structured metadata and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers suggests technical debt in security hardening. The site would benefit from modernization efforts focused on security and privacy compliance to reduce risk and improve user confidence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cl.ly. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cl.ly.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.