Skip to main content

Security report for cityprotect.com

Motorola Solutions · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CityProtect is a public safety and community engagement platform operated under Motorola Solutions, targeting government agencies and community members. The platform provides services such as crime mapping, alert notifications, and public safety data sharing. The website is built using modern technologies including Angular and hosted on AWS, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. The site employs strong security headers like Content-Security-Policy and uses HTTPS, reflecting a good security posture. However, the absence of visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as lack of contact information, indicates gaps in privacy compliance and user transparency. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cityprotect.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

CityProtect operates in the technology sector with a focus on government and public safety markets. As a product under Motorola Solutions, it benefits from strong brand recognition and enterprise scale. The business model appears to be B2G and community engagement, providing critical safety tools and data services. The platform integrates with partner domains such as CommandCentral, enhancing its ecosystem. Growth potential is tied to public safety technology demand and government contracts. The lack of visible direct contact or detailed business information on the site suggests a focus on institutional clients rather than direct consumer sales.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, strict Content-Security-Policy, and domain registration protections. No obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response contact channels are not provided, which could delay handling of security issues. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security maturity and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Add clear contact information including security incident contacts.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Motorola Solutions
Description
CityProtect provides public safety and community engagement solutions, likely focusing on crime mapping, alerts, and public safety data sharing.
Key services
Public safety data sharing, Community crime mapping, Alert notifications
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AWS, Angular (implied by script naming and structure), Google Fonts, Google Analytics, ArcGIS, Tealium, TrustArc
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
AWS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of strict Content-Security-Policy
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by domain and scripts)
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Tealium
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
google-analytics.com, googletagmanager.com, tealiumiq.com, trustarc.com
Marketing tools
Tealium, TrustArc
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern Angular framework and AWS hosting.
  2. Content is minimal on root page, likely a SPA loading content dynamically.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in HTML snapshot.
  4. Strong Content-Security-Policy implemented.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers found in provided HTML.
  6. Multiple external trusted domains used for fonts, analytics, and mapping services.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is well maintained and protected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a single-page application likely built with Angular, served via AWS infrastructure. It uses modern web fonts and integrates multiple third-party services for analytics, mapping, and marketing. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in mobile responsiveness and accessibility. The Content-Security-Policy is well configured, reducing risk of XSS attacks. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or proprietary platform. The technical stack is modern and scalable but could benefit from enhanced SEO and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cityprotect.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cityprotect.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.