Skip to main content

Security report for cityprotect.com.br

Technology · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

CityProtect is a technology-oriented website likely focused on public safety or community protection solutions, targeting government or public safety organizations primarily in Brazil. The website is built using modern technologies such as Angular and hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site content is minimal with no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and lacks direct contact information, which limits user trust and compliance transparency. Security posture is strengthened by a strict Content-Security-Policy and HTTPS usage, but there is room for improvement in privacy compliance and user engagement features. Overall, the site is functional but basic, with moderate performance and limited content depth.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cityprotect.com.br

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
45
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to operate in the technology sector, providing services related to public safety or community protection, possibly in partnership with Motorola Solutions and CommandCentral. The business model is likely B2B, serving government or public safety clients. The lack of explicit business information, certifications, or contact details on the site suggests a need for enhanced transparency to improve credibility and customer trust. The partnership ecosystem includes recognized technology and public safety companies, which may provide competitive advantages. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not discernible from the current website content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy that includes nonce and hash-based script restrictions. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided HTML. However, the absence of a security policy, incident response contact information, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and incident readiness. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Enhancing these areas would improve the overall security culture and reduce risk exposure.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and prominently display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  3. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure page or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility features to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
  5. Incorporate trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, or partner logos to strengthen business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
CityProtect appears to be a technology-focused business likely related to public safety or community protection services, inferred from domain and content context.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
AWS Amplify, Google Fonts, AWS DNS, Blob storage, WebSockets
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
AWS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Strict Content-Security-Policy with nonce and hash for scripts
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by external resources and AWS hosting)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
google-analytics.com, googletagmanager.com, trustarc.com, tealiumiq.com
Marketing tools
trustarc, tealiumiq
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern Angular framework with AWS hosting.
  2. Content is minimal with no visible privacy, cookie, or terms policies.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in HTML.
  4. Strong Content-Security-Policy implemented.
  5. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  6. External links mostly to trusted domains related to social media, analytics, and partner companies.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit business or legal information visible on the homepage.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Angular framework hosted on AWS, leveraging AWS Amplify and AWS DNS services. The Content-Security-Policy is well configured with script nonces and hashes, indicating attention to security best practices. Performance is moderate with external resources loaded from trusted CDNs and cloud providers. However, the site lacks visible SEO optimization beyond basic meta tags and has minimal content, which may impact search engine rankings. Accessibility and mobile responsiveness are basic and could be improved. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or single-page application architecture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cityprotect.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cityprotect.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.