Skip to main content

Security report for cirrato.com

Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc. (LRS) operates the Cirrato.com website, offering print and output management software solutions, including the Cirrato One single server printing product. The company positions itself as a strategic provider of enterprise print management solutions, targeting a broad audience including Windows and Mac users. The website content is professionally presented, with clear navigation and comprehensive product information. Technically, the site uses a modern ASP.NET framework with various analytics and tracking tools integrated, hosted on reliable platforms including Azure services. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA, though some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy and aligns well with the company's business identity and WHOIS registration data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cirrato.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LRS is an established enterprise software company specializing in print and output management solutions. Their business model is B2B, serving industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and financial services. The company offers a range of products and services including cloud printing, pull printing, secure printing, and document process automation. They maintain partnerships with major printer vendors and software providers, enhancing their market position. The website reflects a mature digital presence with strategic content aimed at customer education and lead generation. Growth indicators include active managed services and cloud offerings, with a focus on migration paths from legacy Cirrato products.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and integration of security tools like Google reCAPTCHA. Security headers are partially implemented but could be enhanced with explicit Content-Security-Policy and other modern headers. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not explicitly provided, indicating room for improvement in transparency and compliance. The use of multiple tracking and advertising pixels suggests moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is basic due to lack of cookie consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Create and link a terms of service page for legal clarity.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Levi, Ray & Shoup, Inc.
Description
LRS Output Management enables organizations to streamline their output and print environments by eliminating print servers, printer specific hardware, software, and printers while providing simple yet powerful tools for managing application output. Cirrato One eliminates Windows print servers with single server printing and WAN printing solution for centralized print management, available for Windows and Mac.
Key services
Print Management, Cloud Printing, Pull Printing, Secure Printing, Output Management, Document Process Automation, Managed Services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, Modernizr, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft WebTracking, YouTube Iframe API, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Platforms
Windows, macOS, UNIX, Linux, zOS, Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical URLs use https)
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft WebTracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Clickagy, The Trade Desk
Tracking pixels
Clickagy pixel, ZoomInfo pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft WebTracking
Marketing tools
Google Fonts, YouTube API, reCAPTCHA
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive about Cirrato products and related LRS offerings.
  3. No direct emails or phone numbers found on the main product page; contact is via forms and about-us pages.
  4. No explicit cookie consent banner found despite tracking scripts present.
  5. Security headers partially present; could be improved.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Social media presence on YouTube and LinkedIn confirmed.
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML.
  9. WHOIS data matches company information and branding.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms technology with modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Modernizr. It uses Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft WebTracking, and YouTube API. Hosting appears to leverage Azure Blob Storage for some assets. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. There is some technical debt indicated by legacy ASP.NET WebForms usage, but overall the infrastructure is stable and well maintained.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cirrato.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cirrato.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.