Skip to main content

Security report for cintra.com

Cintra · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cintra is a well-established technology service provider specializing in multi-cloud database architecture, application, and cloud migration and management. With over 20 years of experience, they serve a global clientele including notable enterprises across various sectors. Their key services include assessment, migration, optimization, management, and legacy support, positioning them as trusted partners in digital transformation and modernization initiatives. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and comprehensive content tailored to enterprise customers. Technically, the site leverages modern frameworks such as Vue.js, integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, and employs Google reCAPTCHA v2 for form security. Hosting assets on Amazon S3 and using FontAwesome for icons indicate a robust and scalable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured content. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, includes essential security headers, and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not found, indicating areas for improvement. Privacy and cookie policies exist but lack advanced consent mechanisms, suggesting moderate compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, Cintra demonstrates a strong business and technical foundation with a high level of professionalism and trustworthiness. Strategic enhancements in security transparency and privacy compliance would further strengthen their posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cintra.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
43
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention cintra.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
71
Employees
0
Customers
26
Third parties
45
Weak passwords
18%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for cintra.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cintra operates as an essential entity in the technology sector, focusing on multi-cloud database solutions and modernization services. Their market positioning is strong, supported by a diverse portfolio of services and a global client base including major corporations. The business model centers on providing specialized consulting and managed services, generating revenue through long-term client engagements. The presence of client logos and testimonials indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem. Growth indicators include a comprehensive service offering and active content marketing through insights and case studies. The company targets enterprises undergoing digital transformation, emphasizing freedom of choice and technical excellence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were detected in the analyzed content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests gaps in transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is partial, with privacy and cookie policies present but lacking explicit consent mechanisms. The security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced communication of security practices and incident handling procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  5. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data subject rights.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Cintra
Description
Cintra delivers successful outcomes in database, application, and cloud migration and management, focusing on modernization and optimization for enterprise clients.
Key services
Assess, Mobilize, Migrate, Optimize, Manage, Legacy, Resell
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
FontAwesome 6 Pro, Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 for forms
  • Content Security Policy present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on database and cloud migration services.
  3. Strong presence of client logos and testimonials enhances trust.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present but lack advanced compliance features.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Vue.js for frontend framework, FontAwesome for icons, and Swiper.js for interactive components. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Assets are hosted on Amazon S3, indicating use of cloud infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with valid HTML and CSS. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No technical debt or critical risks were identified, though continuous monitoring of third-party libraries is recommended to avoid vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cintra.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cintra.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.