Skip to main content

Security report for cijmfd.com

公务员报考网 · Education · China

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website '公务员报考网' serves as a specialized information portal for Chinese government civil service examinations, providing comprehensive resources such as exam announcements, registration portals, exam outlines, past exam questions, position listings, interview lists, and score inquiries. It targets prospective civil service candidates and related stakeholders, positioning itself as a professional and focused educational resource platform. The business model revolves around delivering timely and relevant exam-related information and services to its audience. Technically, the website employs a traditional web stack with jQuery and standard CSS/HTML, hosted under a recently registered domain with July Name Limited as the registrar. The site is moderately optimized for performance and SEO, with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. However, it lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating room for improvement in compliance and security maturity. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but does not implement DNSSEC or security headers, which could expose it to certain risks. No evidence of incident response policies or security certifications was found. The WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with the website's purpose, though the domain is very new, suggesting a recently launched or relaunched service. Overall, the website is functional, content-rich, and safe for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance improvements, and clearer business contact information to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  4. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching cijmfd.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the education and government sectors, focusing on civil service exam preparation and information dissemination. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating diverse exam-related resources in one platform, catering specifically to Chinese civil service candidates. Revenue streams are not explicit but likely derive from advertising or partnerships. The target customer segment includes exam candidates nationwide, with regional subdomains indicating localized services. The partnership ecosystem includes various related educational and governmental sites linked as friendly sites. Strategic observations suggest the site is positioning itself as a go-to portal for civil service exam information, leveraging timely updates and comprehensive content to attract and retain users.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the site's resilience against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are evident, and no security certifications are displayed. Privacy compliance is minimal, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR indicators. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries based on the analysis. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant opportunities for improvement to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a cookie policy and consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Publish clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate commitment to security and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
公务员报考网
Description
公务员报考网,国家公务员报考网站官网入口,为考生提供2025年国家公务员考试公告,国家公务员考试报名,国家公务员考试大纲,公务员考试历年真题,国考公务员职位表,国家公务员考试面试名单,国家公务员考试成绩查询等服务。
Key services
国家公务员考试公告, 考试报名, 考试大纲, 历年真题, 职位表, 面试名单, 成绩查询
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, CSS, HTML5, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Baidu linksubmit push.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Chinese and focused on government civil service exam information.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via contact page only.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Website uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with website purpose.
  8. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web technology stack centered on jQuery and standard CSS/HTML without modern frameworks or CMS detected. The domain is newly registered, which may indicate a new or relaunched platform. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization for mobile devices beyond basic responsiveness. SEO is adequately addressed with meta tags and canonical links. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting potential improvements for users with disabilities. Hosting details are limited to registrar information, with no CDN or cloud hosting explicitly detected. The site uses external scripts from Baidu for link submission but lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with cijmfd.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review cijmfd.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.