Skip to main content

Security report for chuangue.com

Binance Holdings Limited · Technology · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.chuangue.com presents itself as a portal for downloading the Binance cryptocurrency exchange app and related services, targeting Chinese-speaking users. It claims affiliation with Binance Holdings Limited, a major player in the blockchain and digital currency industry founded in 2017. The site offers app download links, registration redirects, and some blockchain-related educational content. However, the website lacks official WHOIS registration data, privacy policies, and security best practices, which raises concerns about its legitimacy and trustworthiness. Technically, the site is built with standard HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, with moderate mobile optimization and basic SEO. It uses external scripts for tracking but lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, exposing it to potential security risks. No forms or direct data collection mechanisms are present, reducing immediate data exposure risks but also limiting user engagement. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy compliance measures are significant weaknesses. The missing WHOIS data and use of a generic Gmail contact email further reduce trust. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the site scores low on legitimacy and security, suggesting it may be an unofficial or potentially fraudulent site leveraging Binance branding. Strategically, the site should urgently implement HTTPS, publish privacy and cookie policies, clarify domain ownership, and improve security posture to build user trust and comply with regulations. Without these improvements, the site poses risks to users and may face reputational damage.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: RDP

      Port 3389 (RDP) is publicly accessible - RDP - Remote Desktop, prime ransomware target

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to RDP using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chuangue.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website attempts to position itself as a gateway for Binance app downloads and blockchain-related services, targeting a niche audience of Chinese cryptocurrency users. It leverages Binance's brand recognition but lacks official affiliation confirmation. The business model appears to be affiliate or redirect-based, possibly monetizing user registrations or app downloads. The content includes blockchain education and market commentary, indicating an intent to engage users beyond simple downloads. However, the absence of verifiable company information, official contact details, and regulatory compliance undermines credibility. There is no evidence of direct revenue streams or partnerships. The site operates in a competitive and sensitive market segment where trust and security are paramount, yet it falls short on these fronts.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. Critical security controls such as HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies are missing. The use of external tracking scripts without clear privacy disclosures further complicates compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating a lack of preparedness for security incidents. The WHOIS data absence and generic contact email suggest potential anonymity or obfuscation, which is a red flag in security terms. The site does not collect user data via forms, which limits exposure but also reduces user trust signals. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires immediate remediation to protect users and comply with data protection regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Binance Holdings Limited
Description
币安交易所app下载是Binance Holdings Limited公司旗下是一个全方位的区块链生态品牌，币安创立于2017年 ，向全球提供广泛的数字货币交易、币种信息、区块链教育、区块链慈善基金等服务。币安官网提供币安APP官网下载及注册服务。
Key services
Digital currency trading, Blockchain education, Blockchain charity fund, App download and registration
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
t.ququanqiu.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is in Simplified Chinese targeting Chinese-speaking users interested in Binance app downloads.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact email provided is a generic Gmail address, not a corporate domain email.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  5. No social media links detected.
  6. Website uses some external scripts from t.ququanqiu.com, likely for tracking or analytics.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement information available.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  9. Content quality is basic with some marketing text and app download links.
  10. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. It is moderately optimized for mobile devices and includes meta tags for SEO, though these are basic. External scripts from t.ququanqiu.com are used, likely for tracking or analytics, but no major analytics platforms like Google Analytics are detected. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical for modern web security. Performance appears moderate but could be improved with optimization and modern hosting solutions. The absence of structured data (JSON-LD, Open Graph) limits SEO and social media integration. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but outdated and lacking in security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chuangue.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chuangue.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.