Skip to main content

Security report for chi.lv

Chili Labs · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Chili Labs is a specialized mobile app development agency based in Riga, Europe, focusing on native iOS and Android development as well as Flutter-based cross-platform solutions. With over 8 years of experience and a portfolio of more than 80 businesses, they position themselves as a top-tier agency delivering high-quality, user-centric mobile applications. Their services extend beyond development to include design and app marketing, supported by recognized industry awards such as Clutch and Red Dot. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, and integrates common analytics and marketing tools. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks advanced security headers and published policies. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is an area for improvement. Overall, Chili Labs presents a credible and professional digital presence suitable for their target market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chi.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
88
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a service-based technology agency targeting startups and established businesses needing mobile app development and design. Their competitive advantage lies in their expertise with Flutter and native platforms, combined with a strong design focus and marketing services. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts and ongoing marketing services. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem evidenced by awards and client logos. Growth indicators include a diverse portfolio and industry recognition. The business model is client-centric, emphasizing tailored solutions and long-term partnerships.

Security posture

Chili Labs demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data detected. However, the absence of security headers and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security best practices. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or a security.txt file. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly demonstrated on the website, and cookie consent mechanisms are missing. The company should enhance its security posture by implementing recommended headers, publishing policies, and establishing incident response channels to reduce risk and build trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to secure DNS infrastructure and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish a security policy and provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chili Labs
Description
Chili Labs is a mobile app development agency based in Riga, Europe, specializing in native app development for iOS and Android, leveraging Flutter for UI/UX. They have over 8 years of experience and have worked with more than 80 businesses, offering custom, user-friendly mobile solutions.
Key services
iOS Native Development, Android Native Development, Flutter Development, Code Audit, Mobile Design, Design Review, Web Design, Design Concept, Accessibility Audit, ASO & App Marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, CSS, SVG, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics, Partytown
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security-related scripts for consent management

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and fully accessible.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided content.
  3. Contact information is only via contact form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Strong portfolio and awards indicate credible business presence.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; DNSSEC not enabled.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Next.js and React, ensuring fast loading and excellent mobile optimization. The use of Partytown indicates an effort to optimize third-party script performance. Analytics and marketing tools are integrated via Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Ads, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags and Open Graph data for SEO and social sharing. Hosting is via NameCheap DNS servers, with no explicit hosting provider identified. Performance is fast, and accessibility is good, though no explicit accessibility features were detected. There is no CMS explicitly identified, suggesting a custom or headless CMS solution. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chi.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chi.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.