Skip to main content

Security report for checkpoint.com

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. · Technology · Israel

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is a globally recognized leader in cybersecurity solutions, serving corporate enterprises and government entities. Founded in 1993 and headquartered in Tel Aviv, Israel, the company offers a comprehensive portfolio of products and services including network security, cloud security, endpoint protection, SASE, AI-driven threat prevention, managed security services, and cybersecurity training. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content tailored to a global enterprise audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries and frameworks, optimized for SEO and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, cookie consent mechanisms, and use of monitoring tools, though explicit security headers and incident response information could be enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data is notable but does not detract from the overall legitimacy and trustworthiness of the site. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency around security policies and incident response, and ensuring all security headers are implemented.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching checkpoint.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention checkpoint.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
13,859
Employees
120
Customers
13,476
Third parties
263
Weak passwords
17%

Latest record dated 2026-05-29 · 1,745 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for checkpoint.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –accounts.checkpoint.com2026-05-29
  • –adfs.checkpoint.com2026-05-28
  • –adfs.checkpoint.com2026-05-28
  • –ds.checkpoint.com2026-05-27
  • –accounts.checkpoint.com2026-05-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Check Point holds a strong market position as a cybersecurity leader with a broad product suite addressing network, cloud, endpoint, and AI security needs. Their business model focuses on enterprise and government clients, offering both products and managed services. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a robust training and certification ecosystem. The website's content and structure support lead generation and customer engagement effectively. Growth indicators include emphasis on emerging technologies like AI and GenAI security. The partnership ecosystem is visible through linked domains and social media presence. Overall, Check Point demonstrates a well-established, enterprise-grade operation with global reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent compliant with GDPR, and integration of security monitoring tools like Sentry. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not explicitly detected in the HTML content and should be verified. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The lack of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact page is a gap in transparency. No security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program was detected. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be improved with enhanced transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly declare security headers including CSP, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed compliance standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
Description
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is a leading provider of cyber security solutions to corporate enterprises and governments globally.
Key services
Network Security, SASE, Cloud Security, Endpoint Protection, Threat Prevention, Security Operations, AI Security Solutions, Managed Security Services, Training and Certification
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Yoast SEO, Flickity, YouTube Modal, js-cookie, Google Tag Manager, Sentry, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security monitoring scripts (Sentry)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Ahrefs Analytics, Sentry
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Ahrefs Analytics, Sentry
Marketing tools
Drift, AddToAny
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong corporate branding and consistent messaging
  3. Comprehensive product and service offerings in cybersecurity
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. Presence of cookie consent and privacy policy indicating GDPR compliance
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content
  7. No visible security policy or incident response contact page
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a major corporate domain
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Bootstrap, Flickity, and others for UI and functionality. It integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics, Sentry for error monitoring, and OneTrust for cookie consent management, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses structured data (JSON-LD) extensively for organization and navigation elements, improving search engine visibility. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical risks are minimal but should include continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies and security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium21 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with checkpoint.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review checkpoint.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.