Skip to main content

Security report for chebrowser.site

Technology · Serbia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Che Browser is a specialized software product designed to enable users to manage multiple accounts on various websites by substituting browser and hardware fingerprints. The product targets professionals such as CPA network partners and SMM managers who require industrial-scale account management from a single PC. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear descriptions of the product's purpose and features. Technically, the site uses modern frontend frameworks like Vue.js and Vuetify, integrates analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Yandex Metrika, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. However, the site lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and no terms of service are provided. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced, but no security headers were detected in the provided data, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Contact information is limited to Telegram channels, with no email or phone contacts available. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security best practices to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching chebrowser.site

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, focusing on niche antidetect browser software for multi-account management. Its subscription-based model with additional paid customizations suggests diversified revenue streams. The target audience includes digital marketers and CPA network partners, indicating a B2B focus. The domain age and registration details support a stable small business presence. The use of Telegram for support and developer contact indicates a lean operational model. The absence of formal privacy and security policies may impact customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to be positioning itself as a specialized tool provider within a competitive market of browser fingerprint spoofing solutions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency in handling security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps, especially relevant under GDPR. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts without visible consent mechanisms further impacts privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided data, but improvements in security best practices are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear terms of service and incident response contact information.
  4. Enhance contact options beyond Telegram to include official company email and phone support.
  5. Review and disclose data retention policies related to analytics and user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Che Browser is a desktop application that substitutes browser and hardware fingerprints to enable managing multiple accounts on various websites without being banned. It targets users who need to create and manage multiple accounts on platforms like Facebook, Bing, Yahoo, Google, Instagram, and others.
Key services
Antidetect browser software, Browser and hardware fingerprint substitution, Multiple profile management, Custom domain profile customization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, Vue.js (implied by Vuetify CSS and app structure), Vuetify UI framework, Google Fonts, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Vue.js, Vuetify
Platforms
Windows (software target platform)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Marketing tools
Yandex Metrika, JivoSite chat widget
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers a niche antidetect browser product for multi-account management.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact is only via Telegram links, no email or phone numbers provided.
  4. Uses modern frontend technologies (Vue.js, Vuetify) and analytics tools.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  7. Content is professional and relevant to target audience.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern frontend technologies such as Vue.js and Vuetify, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly interface. Hosting is managed via Cloudflare DNS, providing DNS-level security and performance benefits. Analytics integration with Google Tag Manager and Yandex Metrika enables detailed user behavior tracking, although privacy compliance is lacking. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and uses asynchronous script loading to optimize performance. The overall technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and SEO optimizations. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based build. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with chebrowser.site. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review chebrowser.site.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.